Monday, March 26, 2012

Scouring the Nation (Part 10)

In this edition of "Scouring the Nation", I review several top prospects, including a first-team all-NAIA player with NBA aspirations.



While he does not have the same name recognition as most Division I prospects, Philander Smith's Ken Brown is one of the top non-D1 prospects in the nation. (I have him tabbed as a top 3 player along with Johnson & Wales' Lamonte Thomas and Farmingdale St.'s AJ Matthews) And, it should also be noted that this was his first season at Philander Smith after he transferred from Western Kentucky. (and before that Cerritos College and Southwest Tennessee Community College) Because he has been a college basketball journeyman over his four years, playing at four different schools, it must be said that his accomplishments this season are all the more impressive. Not only does he have great chemistry with his teammates, but he was able to fit in with his team's system and thrive in his very first season with a new squad. Brown is clearly one of the most talented players that I have reviewed and should find success on whichever team is willing to give him an opportunity, whether that be in the NBA or overseas.

Despite his eye popping scoring numbers, (31.9 points per contest) Brown is more than capable of distributing the ball to his teammates. He involves them early and often, throwing it down court to them off of steals and making proper, fundamental post entry feeds. He knows which hand to feed his big man on and executes with precise bounce passes. Brown regularly finds cutters as well, and is willing to slash in the lane and draw defenders before either making wrap-around passes to a big man, or hitting wide open three point shooters. Brown is clearly most effective passing the ball in transition, but was able to dish the ball to his teammates under a variety of different circumstances as described above. It must also be noted that Brown shared time at point guard with DeMarkus Lipscomb, a 5'8 junior who allowed him to play off the ball at times. When he did, Brown did a good job of rubbing off screens and setting himself up for decent three point looks. Due to his quick release, he does not need much of a window to get his shot off.

At a higher level of basketball, Brown's role will change dramatically, and he will be asked to look for his teammates before asserting himself offensively. While his virtual one-to-one assist to turnover ratio does not appear to indicate that he can make such an adjustment, this statistic must be qualified. Much like Lamonte Thomas, Brown had the ball in his hands for most of the game, as he was the only player on his team that could create his own offense. If kenpom's usage statistics existed for NAIA, I am certain that Brown would be a top 5 player nationwide. Because his role will be so different at the next level, it is hard to tell whether or not turnovers will be a concern. He could stand to tighten up his handle on crossover moves and dribble drives to the basket, but he rarely ran into any problems beating players off the bounce. He was able to implement the change-of-pace dribble when getting to the basket, but he will have to utilize this more often at the next level and work to become even more effective in beating his man. At the NAIA level, he was dominant attacking the basket and was able to weave between defenders both in halfcourt sets and in transition. His first step is very fast, but he will need to utilize an array of different moves to break free from bigger defenders at the next level.

In terms of his greatest strength, Brown is an NBA-caliber shooter. Out of his staggering 650 field goal attempts, Ken was able to connect on 50.3% of his shots this season. Brown displays an ideal form on his jump shot and has good lift. He is able to pullup from the mid range or from beyond the arc. In the contests that I watched, he was able to step back off the dribble with defenders in his face and bury rhythm three point baskets. He also was capable of connecting from distance off the catch, and displayed a quick release with defenders closing out on him. Brown shot an excellent 41.2% from beyond the arc on 274 attempts this season. Those are pretty remarkable numbers given the sheer volume of shots. He also was effective from the line, hitting 80.3% of his attempts, and got there frequently- 239 attempts on the year.

On the defensive end, it was difficult to evaluate Brown's play due to his team's zone. When they moved to more of a matchup zone, Brown demonstrated good fundamentals and rarely allowed his man to beat him. He has good lateral quickness and the ability to successfully close out on his man. However, it is difficult to evaluate what type of help instincts Brown has because help instincts are different in a zone. With that said, he does have extremely quick hands and regularly deflects the ball, as demonstrated by his 3.13 steals per game. In the contests that I witnessed, he was able to tap the ball to himself and turn steals into transition run outs. Because of his team's zone, though, he often overcommitted and would play far out on the perimeter, guiding his man to his off hand and into a trap. But, his ability to do this will likely diminish at the next level, as he will be required to play fundamentally sound man-to-man defense on a regular basis. How he adjusts then, defensively, will likely determine the level of basketball which he will play at next season.

Overall, Brown is one of the more remarkable stories because he undoubtably had the talent to achieve success at a Division 1 school, but did not have any more eligibility remaining after he was forced to leave Western Kentucky. How he measures with NBA scouts will likely determine where he lands initially. While he is listed at 6'1 currently, other sources have him tabbed 5'10. Regardless of his size, Brown has the jump shot and basketball instincts to play at a high level and should land on an NBA summer league roster at a bare minimum.

Another one of the top NAIA prospects in the nation is Tougaloo's Marquise Mems. Standing at 6'5, Mems has a strong NBA body that is a bit undersized for the shooting guard spot. At the NAIA level, he is very big for a wing, and is able to beat smaller players off the dribble. He is a fluid athlete and is able to get the ball down court in a hurry.

As a result, Mems scores the vast majority of his points in transition or attacking the basket. He is most effective in this capacity and is very strong finishing at the hoop. He does a good job of initiating contact and drawing fouls, as evinced by his 229 FT attempts on the year. When he got to the line, however, he only hit 62% of his attempts, something that must be improved on to receive any playing time professionally. While he is capable of getting to the basket in half court sets as well, he needs to tighten his handle and keep the ball lower to the ground. Otherwise, he will turn the ball over more frequently at the professional level. He currently does a nice job of shielding the ball with his body and finishing at the hoop. He attacks the body when finishing and is more than willing to attempt to dunk over a defender. Mems has excellent athleticism and he displays his remarkable leaping ability out in transition. He was fouled very hard on a regular basis from what I saw, and was willing to tough it out and stay in the game.

In terms of his shooting ability, this is one of his biggest weaknesses. He is extremely streaky and must work hard to improve his efficiency from the field. While he did connect on some three point shots off the dribble when I saw him, he had paltry shooting percentages from behind the arc. He only hit 30.9% of his attempts. This is partially due to the fact that he took so many of them, 207 attempts, and the degree of difficulty that he is willing to settle for on so many of those shots. His 43.3% FG% is not the mark of an efficient scorer, and he must work to further develop his shooting stroke. Mechanically, he must work to maintain a consistent form. He does not go straight up and down on his shot and tends to fade left at times. Even more problematic, Mems often shoots the ball on the way down from his jump, leading to inconsistent results in his shot trajectory. In order to be effective at the next level, he is going to have to shoot the same way everytime and avoid off balance shots.

With regard to his intangibles, Mems does a decent job of feeding his teammates at times. He is capable of solid post entry feeds (a lost art in the game today), and is willing to give the ball up, particularly in transition. He was asked to handle some point guard responsibilities when the ball was denied to his team's lead guard. He handled them fairly well, but did occasionally take an ill-advised three pointer early in the shot clock. This was because his man gave him some space, and he casually connected on this three point attempt off of one dribble. As was alluded to previously, Mems must improve his shot selection and learn when to dial in his own number. Further, he turns the ball over frequently and has a 0.53 Assist-to-Turnover ratio. He must take care of the ball and improve his basketball IQ in this area, learning when to pass and shoot. His development in this regard will determine how far he can advance professionally. Despite this weakness, Mems is an excellent rebounder for his size, pulling in 6.32 rebounds per game due to his solid athleticism. He does a fine job of boxing out and securing weakside rebounds, and is willing to fly in for boards when he is initially playing on the perimeter.

On the defensive end, Mems is fairly assertive and has decent lateral quickness. He was able to force the ball to rotate several times in the contests that I saw and was aggressive on this end of the floor. His good athleticism allows him to contest shots at the rim, and his solid length enables him to deflect passes in transition. Mems has quick hands and the ability to turn steals into transition buckets. He did this on several occasions and averages an excellent 2.47 steals per game and 0.82 blocks per contest. In terms of his defensive weaknesses, Mems must be assertive on this end at all times. He remained upright far too often, and as such, his effort level and intensity must change for him to have an impact on this end in professional basketball. While he is effective at this level of play, he might struggle to defend players with similar size and athleticism on the wing. But, this remains to be seen, as there aren't many players that fit that billing at the NAIA level.

Overall, Mems has a good physical profile and the tools to be a decent role player at the professional level. He must learn to adjust to a more limited role and improve his shooting prowess in order to receive playing time at a higher level of basketball. Marquise Mems is an intriguing player at the NAIA level with solid athleticism, and I am almost certain that his basketball playing days will continue somewhere overseas.


Another prospect with a bright future ahead of him is Rust College's Markeith Wilson. Playing as a Division III Independent does not allow him to receive much recognition for his basketball talents. And, it was difficult to get footage and statistics of him, as there is nothing on their website and there are only a few videos of Rust College basketball circulating on the internet.

With this in mind, it should be noted that Wilson is a solid basketball player with a future playing overseas. He is most proficient from behind the three point arc, where he connected on 38.8% of his 201 3 point attempts a year ago. He does an excellent job of squaring his body and has a quick release. In the contests that I watched, he was forced to take difficult three point shots, as he was overplayed on virtually every possession that he had the ball. As a result, he drained three point shots from beyond NBA range and was able to connect on some tough pullup three point baskets off the dribble. Overall, he has a picture-perfect stroke with good elevation, and he does a nice job of squaring his body to the basket on every shot attempt. Wilson can become a decent midrange jump shooter, but must learn to work off of screen sets, which were not always available to him in the games that I watched.

When he is not shooting off the bounce or connecting on long range shots, Wilson utilizes the threat of his shot to beat defenders off the dribble. He does a nice job of implementing the head fake, and then blowing by his man once he gets him in the air. After blowing by his defender, Wilson has the ability to finish at the rim or dish to his teammates inside if the defense rotates over. He also regularly finds open three point shooters off the dribble. It should be noted, though, that he is not particularly explosive as a run jump athlete and thus is more of a finesse finisher at the rim. At higher levels of basketball, he is going to need to work to shield his body and score, as he already has a knack for attacking the shot blocker's chest and drawing fouls. He is not particularly strong finishing through contact, but is crafty enough to hang in the air and score around players. He does have decent hang time even though he is not the best run-jump athlete, as he oftentimes plays below the rim. Before he can excel attacking the basket, though, he must first develop his dribble drive abilities. At this stage, he does not possess the requisite first step to blow by his man and finish at the rim. He instead relies on basketball savvy to get his defender off balance. But, he must work on improving his handle if he hopes to develop more of a slashing game.

Despite his lack of explosive quickness off the dribble, he is fast in transition and is able to get down the floor in a hurry and break away ahead of the pack. He did this on several occasions that I witnessed. In one instance, he did a nice job of boxing out his man and then sprinted all the way downcourt for a fast break layup. He may be able to excel in this area at the next level, as he is able to anticipate run outs fairly well. Wilson generally has a very high basketball IQ and is able to play under control under most circumstances within his team's offensive sets. With that said, when he caught fire from three point land, he tended to shoot until he missed, opting for long three point bombs early in the shot clock. He must avoid such attempts if he hopes to receive extended minutes at the professional level.

Defensively, it was difficult to fully evaluate him. Still, there were times where he did display decent help instincts. In one instance, he allowed his teammate to cover a player slashing to the hoop and successfully closed out on an open three point shooter. When he was forced into a mismatch with big man Darrell Miller inside, he played physical post defense and was unwilling to give up too much ground in the post. Thus, he may be effective switching within a professional defensive scheme. With that said, Wilson is not particularly laterally quick and will likely struggle to defend elite level athletes at the next level. He does have decent defensive instincts though, and may learn to recover and pick up another player on a switch.

Overall, Markeith Wilson is one of the better pure shooters that I have reviewed. Even though his 38.8% three point percentage does not indicate it, he is very dynamic shooting the ball and defenders regularly overplay him. In many instances, he often receives double teams on the perimeter. Wilson must continue to improve his handle and middle-game in order to become a more well rounded offensive weapon at the next level. Defensively, he must continue to work and develop his ability to lock down on the perimeter.


Finally, Fisk University's Darrell Miller deserves a mention despite the fact that he was reviewed on two separate occasions before this. He still brings pretty much the same skillset to the table as was noted in earlier editions. However, it should be noted that he has become a better passer and works to free himself inside. When he is unable to receive deep post position due to his weak lower body strength, Miller is capable of cutting to the hoop for dunks or simply working off the offensive glass. He is one of the best in this capacity. However, when he does inevitably draw fouls, he must finish his free throw attempts. Additionally, while his shooting form does have some promise, his shot is a bit flat when he steps out and attempts open perimeter jumpers. Overall, Miller is an incredibly active player with excellent athleticism and the ability to be a prospect down the road. I will keep following his development to see where he is in a couple of years.


(Image Sources: Cerritos.edu and gcaconf.com)

Letter To the Portsmouth Invitational

In the spirit of full-disclosure, the following is my private email to the heads of the Portsmouth Invitational tournament urging them to accept more non-D1 talent so that NBA teams and squads overseas can adequately gauge talent that they likely have seen little of. More importantly, though, the players that I recommend are more than capable of holding their own against the top senior talent in D1.


To Whom it May Concern:


My name is Jordan and I am a talent evaluator for college basketball players. Upon scouting the best players outside of Division 1, I have come to a consensus of the top 5 seniors, all of which deserve an opportunity at the Portsmouth Invitational. I know that last year not one non-D1 player was invited to Portsmouth. This has to change, as there is some serious talent among the five players I am about to list.

The following is the case for the top 5 seniors outside of Division 1:

Lamonte Thomas, Johnson & Wales, DIII, 34.1 ppg, 5.8rpg, and 4.8 apg, 38% 3 pt %

Thomas was the best scorer in Division 3 the past two seasons. He is a 6'2 point guard with an excellent handle and deceptive quickness. He can shoot over the top of players at his level, but is best getting to the rim. He has the athleticism to be effective at a higher level of basketball. He should be a shoe-in for this tournament, as he is one of DIII's alltime greats.


Tony Smith, Shaw University, DII, 12.2ppg, 6.9rpg, 5.8apg, 1.9spg, 38% 3pt %

While he is older than his graduating class, Smith has the best vision of the five players I mention. He is a 6'5 point guard who is dynamic in transition and picks his spots on the floor. He could easily average 16 ppg and 8 apg if he looked for his own offense more often. Extremely effective in transition and defensively. Great hands. Threw 2 full court passes off rebounds with a player back in transition in the NCAA tournament. That's something maybe 7-10 guys on the planet can complete.


Ken Brown, Philander Smith, NAIA D1, 31.97ppg, 4 rpg, 4 apg, 3.13 spg, 41.2% 3pt%

This 6'1 lead guard is a scoring machine who is lightning quick and has great hands and can lock down on D. He is an excellent three point shooter, as evinced by his percentage given his 274 attempts on the year. Leading scorer in NAIA and one of the best players in a few years.


Eric Frederick, Texas Wesleyan, NAIA D1, 25.41ppg, 10.19 rpg, 1.03spg, 52.5 % FG%

He is one of the more unique big men that I have seen at a non D1 school at 6'8. He can score in a variety of ways, but was forced to handle the ball a little much this year. He often faced double and triple teams. Despite being 265 lbs, he is very mobile and has a wide array of power post moves. Not only that, he has a decent handle for his size, even though he can make some questionable passes at times. Also, he can step out and hit the three with some consistency. His percentage is only 31%, but he started catching fire late in the season from beyond the arc. Really a unique player.


Travis Hyman, Bowie St., NCAA D2, 10.1 ppg, 8.6rpg, 2.93 bpg, 47.1% FG%

While his numbers do not really stand out at first glance, this guy has the most potential of any of the guys listed. While he has developed only somewhat over his college years, Hyman has NBA level athleticism. He is one of the best shot blockers outside of D1 and he alters many more shots. He finishes well near the rim and can run the floor. He is 7'0 tall and once played with former Portsmouth selection Duke Crews. Scouting services have been looking into Hyman over the past few years and while his numbers are not as impressive as they could have been statistically speaking, he is an impact player who can more than hold his own against the field.



I want it to be known that I have no affiliation with any of these players. These are just my suggestions, and as I scout non-D1 talent, I would like to have some players represent the lower levels of college basketball at Portsmouth. The aforementioned players have competed against top flight talent before, with Smith going up against the likes of Duke and performing fairly well. Ken Brown dropped 22 points at Arkansas Little Rock and 28 against Central Arkansas this year. Lamonte Thomas had 26 points, 9 rebounds, and 5 assists against Brown University. So, these guys can fill it up against D1 schools.


Let me know what you think of these players, and if you are open to some suggestions.

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Portsmouth Suggested Invites 2012

Below is a list suggesting which players should be invited to the Portsmouth Invitational held in two weeks. Some seniors were left off, as I assume that they would not accept their invite. (in no particular order)

1. SF Antwaine Wiggins, College of Charleston
2. SG Brandon Wood, Michigan St.
3. SF Olek Czyz, Nevada
4. SF Kyle Weems, Missouri St.
5. SF DeQuan Jones, Miami (Fl.)
6. PF/C Bernard James, Florida St.
7. PF Terrance Henry, Ole Miss
8. PF/C Gus Gilchrist, South Florida
9. PF Quincy Acy, Baylor
10. SF Anthony Jones, Baylor
11. PF Jesse Perry, Arizona
12. SG Ramone Moore, Temple
13. SF/PF Wendell McKines, New Mexico St.
14. SG Kevin Murphy, Tennessee Tech
15. PF Dominique Morrison, Oral Roberts
16. PG Casper Ware, Long Beach St.
17. SF Chase Stanback, UNLV
18. PG Joe Ragland, Wichita St.
19. PG Scoop Jardine, Syracuse
20. PF/C Kyle O'Quinn, Norfolk St.
21. C Kenny Frease, Xavier
22. SF Chris Johnson, Dayton
23. C Michael Eric, Temple
24. PF Eli Holman, Detroit
25. PF/C Miles Plumlee, Duke
26. PF David Loubeau, Texas A&M
27. PF Keith Wright, Harvard
28. PG/SG Jason Clark, Georgetown
29. SG Devoe Joseph, Oregon
30. C Greg Mangano, Yale
31. PG Lamonte Thomas, Johnson & Wales
32. PF Josh Owens, Stanford
33. PG Jordan Theodore, Seton Hall
34. PF Mike Glover, Iona
35. SG Kyle Kuric, Louisville
36. SG Dion Dixon, Cincinnati
37. C Robert Sacre, Gonzaga
38. C Garret Stutz, Wichita St.
39. SF Kenny Gabriel, Auburn
40. SF Alex Young, IUPUI
41. PF LaRon Dendy, Middle Tennessee St.
42. PF Eric Griffin, Campbell
43. PF Justin Greene, Kent St.
44. C Xavier Gibson, Florida St.
45. C Travis Hyman, Bowie St.
46. PG Tony Smith, Shaw University
47. PG Chris Smith, Louisville
48. SF/PF Ken Horton, Central Connecticut St.
49. PG Juan Fernandez, Temple
50. PG Zack Rosen, UPenn
51. PG Ken Brown, Philander Smith
52. SG Darrion Pellum, Hampton
53. SG Carlon Brown, Colorado
54. SG Deividas Dulkys, Florida St.
55. PF Julian Mavunga, Miami (Oh.)
56. PG Damier Pitts, Marshall
57. C Mitchell Watt, Buffalo
58. PF Jarrod Jones, Ball St.
59. PF Cameron Moore, UAB
60. SF Kent Bazemore, ODU
61. PG Jorge Gutierrez, Cal
62. PG Reggie Hamilton, Oakland
63. SG Savalace Townsend, Arkansas Pine-Bluff
64. PF Eric Frederick, Texas Wesleyan

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Top 30 Prospects Outside D1

The following is a list of the top 30 basketball prospects outside of Division 1. This list incorporates multiple levels and spans NCAA Division 2, NCAA Division 3, and NAIA Division 1. Prospects have a chance to rise in their conference tournaments, but the following is a composite ranking based on this season's performances. This list took considerable scouting time and some statistical analysis. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.

1. Karron Johnson, Junior, Shaw University, Division 2
2. Lamonte Thomas, Senior, Johnson & Wales, Division 3
3. AJ Matthews, Junior, Farmingdale St., Division 3
4. Marcus Goode, Junior, Benedict College, Division 2
5. Jeremy Kendle, Junior, Bellarmine University, Division 2
6. Travis Hyman, Senior, Bowie St., Division 2
7. Eric Frederick, Senior, Texas Wesleyan, NAIA Division 1
8. Ken Brown, Senior, Philander Smith, NAIA Division 1




9. Cardell McFarland, Senior, Kentucky Wesleyan, Division 2
10. Temi Adebayo, Senior, Philadelphia University, Division 2
11. Tyrone Shelley, Senior, Georgetown College, NAIA Division 1
12. Malik Alvin, Senior, Shaw University, Division 2
13. LA Farmer, Senior, Arkansas Monticello, Division 2
14. Anthony Young, Senior, Kentucky Wesleyan, Division 2
15. Cody Schilling, Senior, Augustana Sd., Division 2
16. Teondre Williams, Senior, Clayton St., Division 2
17. Braydon Hobbs, Senior, Bellarmine University, Division 2
18. Jet Chang, Senior, BYU-Hawaii, Division 2


19. Travis Wilkins, Junior, St. Catharine College, NAIA Division 1
20. Keane Thoman, Senior, Missouri Southern, Division 2
21. Antonio Smith, Senior, Shaw University, Division 2
22. Ronnie Moss, Senior, Texas Wesleyan, NAIA Division 1
23. DJ Rivera, Senior, Montevallo, Division 2
24. Isaac Thornton, Junior, Fairmont St., Division 2
25. Sammy Emile, Senior, Mars Hill, Division 2
26. Cedric Harris, Sophomore, West Liberty, Division 2
27. Steve Custis, Senior, Fairmont St., Division 2
28. Da'Ron Sims, Senior, West Georgia, Division 2
29. Marquise Mems, Senior, Tougaloo, NAIA Division 1
30. Fayzon Richey, Junior, Saint Gregory's, NAIA Division 1


[Pictures: AJ Matthews (Source: Farmingdale St. Website), Cardell McFarland (Source: Twitter Picture), Jet Chang (Source: mauinow.com)]

Monday, February 20, 2012

Scouring the Nation (Part 9)

In this edition of Scouring the Nation, I explore some more Division III professional prospects.



Upon watching a Drew University men's basketball contest, it becomes clear that Asmar Capers is not only their best offensive option, but is a rather complete player at the DIII level. While he does not possess a supremely quick first step, he plays within himself and finds ways to methodically put the ball in the basket.

Capers has a decent physical profile and is capable of banging on both ends of the floor. In the contests that I saw him, he got to the line with some consistency and was active in transition. More often than not, he converted on his attempts, displaying a nice shooting form in the process. Additionally, he makes use of the shot fake and tends to throw defenders off balance before attempting to blow by them. He struggled to get by his man with his quickness though, and this will be a significant weakness when he attempts to play overseas. Further, he is not a vertically explosive athlete, preferring to lay shots in off the glass rather than finishing strong at the rim. Because of this, he has limited potential on both ends of the floor. With that said, his handle allows him to compensate for his poor athleticism at times. Capers can also be deadly from long range when he is able to catch fire.

Defensively, Capers struggled with his consistency. He gave up on defense at times, appearing to be frustrated. However, on several possessions, he was able to slide his feet and force offensive players to kick the ball back out. Because he is not particularly fast, he struggled to challenge in transition. In the contests that I saw, he did not always hustle down the court on every play. With that said, he has some room for improvement, and if he is willing to put the time in to slim down, Capers could be an effective role player overseas somewhere.



Elsewhere in DIII, Hamilton College forward Pat Sullivan had a solid career for his team and could potentially continue playing somewhere overseas. His best performance against Williams College illustrated his strengths and limitations. Sullivan possesses solid post fundamentals, with the ability to drop step or go to his counter moves inside. He is strong on the block and can hit the medium range jumper when called upon.

Further, over the course of his four years at Hamilton, Sullivan extended his range and now possesses the ability to connect on shots out past the three point line. In his contest against Williams, he was able to utilize solid footwork and shot fakes to get open shots. And when he did, he finished with remarkable proficiency, connecting on 11 of 15 shots. While this was a career night, it is clear that Sullivan has a diversified skillset on the offensive end and is capable of functioning as a spot up shooter.

With that said, Sullivan will struggle to guard big men at the next level due to his average footspeed and below average height at 6'7. Still, Sullivan is a competitor who will likely find a niche somewhere.


Salem St.'s forward Brian Clark is even more undersized than Sullivan, but was more efficient from the field, connecting on 62% of his shot attempts compared to Sullivan's 49%. (on the year) Clark is more of a traditional post option, but can step out and hit the perimeter jumper. In the contests that I watched Clark, he tended to fight for position down low, looking to seal his man at every opportunity. When he did, he was able to either drive around his defender or faceup for a turnaround jumper in the lane.

Clark was remarkably efficient from the field in his senior season, and tended to pick his spots, contributing to his team's success. Additionally, he was a good rebounder for his size, despite the fact that he functioned as a low post option. Moreover, Clark was aggressive on defense and was his team's best shot blocker. If he can develop more of a perimeter game to keep defenses honest and improve on his current conditioning, Clark may be able to obtain a role off the bench at some professional level.


University of Chicago's Matt Johnson had one of the best careers in his school's history. This 6'4 guard has the height and length to be effective at the next level. Further, his upper body appears to be fairly underdeveloped at this stage of his career and a professional training staff may enable him to get stronger in order to be competitive. Johnson's game is suited for European basketball, as he tends to get free off of screens and thrives moving without the ball. He rubs off screens well and takes advantage of his team's offensive sets.


Further, Johnson possesses a decent crossover and handle, and thus is able to take his man off the bounce once he catches the ball on a curl route. After receiving the ball, he loves to pull up for an open jumper when defenders overcommit to his drive. He does a good job of drawing fouls in this situation and is able to get to the line fairly frequently. Johnson is also able to execute basic basketball plays such as the give-and-go and screen-and-roll with some proficiency.

Johnson's high basketball IQ coupled with his decent length allow him to challenge defenders when they initially get the ball. He did a great job of denying the ball and swiping without fouling. However, when his man was able to get deep position on him and attack the basket, Johnson's weak upper body strength tended to limit his ability on the defensive end. Therein, if Johnson is able to put the time in to transform his body, he should be able to excel at the next level, whereever that may be.

While Matt Johnson has good potential at the next level, another Johnson was among the leaders nationally in scoring. Raysean Johnson of D'Youville was one of the major impact players this season in DIII basketball. Not only was he capable of scoring the ball from the perimeter, but he was strongest attacking the basket. Johnson often played at his own pace driving to the hoop, scoring through defenders without exceptional quickness or change-of-pace dribble moves. He was able to do this because he understands spacing and has the handle to drive in between defenders and either dish the ball off to his teammates or score in traffic. Also, Johnson was one of the best in DIII at anticipating contact and getting to the line. He possesses a believable shot fake and the necessary scoring instincts to understand how to get his man in the air. And, when he got to the line, he normally connected on his free throws, seldom letting an opportunity pass him by. At times, he did turn the ball over when trying to break through a zone defense and when pushing the tempo. Still, given the number of possessions that he had the ball in his hands, his turnovers were few and far between.

Raysean Johnson was aggressive on the glass and displayed good box out fundamentals in the contests that I watched. He was able to secure rebounds and push ahead. Further, he has a decent pull up jumper in his arsenal to keep defenses honest. On the opposite end, Johnson displayed decent lateral quickness, but put forth countless lackluster efforts in trying to stop the ball in transition. He often was unwilling to race down the floor in order to catch players on the opposing team that were cherry-picking. Further, he did not always get in his stance and missed several trap opportunities. At the next level, Johnson will have to put in a lot more effort to guard bigger players. Otherwise, he will be relegated to the bench in spite of his talent.

Despite his limitations defensively, Johnson was able to hit a game winning layup in one of the contests that I witnessed. He appears to have some intangibles on the offensive end, but must work to improve his outside shot and go to his pullup jumper with more regularity.


A player with a decent physical profile for the next level is Middlebury's Ryan Sharry. The 6'8 forward was one of the top post players in all of DIII and displayed solid fundamentals on both ends of the floor. On the offensive end, he made some heads up plays to get open, particularly off of inbounds passes. He also made several backdoor cuts to free himself close to the hoop. He was capable attacking his man off the dribble and drawing contact in post up situations. Further, he can step out and hit the three point basket, as evinced by his 42.9% 3 point %. Not only does he display great form and balance on his jump shots, but he can also connect on shots fading away from the hoop. This should increase his chances of landing a roster spot at a higher level of European basketball.

Further, Sharry was aggressive on the glass and would box out to secure defensive rebounds. He hustles to loose balls and is willing to sacrifice his body. When he does secure deep post position, he possesses a nice drop step and pivot move, which he executes rather quickly. On the defensive end, Sharry is not blessed with exceptional lateral quickness, but he does play with fire and gets his hands up to contest shots. Sharry's ideal height and basketball savvy make him one of the clear cut candidates to land on a European roster next season.

Finally, Franklin & Marshall's Georgio Milligan is the most complete player mentioned in this article. He excels on both ends of the floor do to his solid physical tools as well as his tremendous basketball IQ. Milligan is an efficient scorer from the field. While he only attempted 78 three point shots all year, he connected on 44.9% of them. Further, he possesses a decent midrange game, but must work to keep a consistent shooting motion when pressured. With that said, he was able to dial in on some tough fadeaway jumpers.

In terms of his greatest strengths on the offensive end, Milligan is best moving towards the basket. He is extremely physical and has the footspeed and athleticism to avoid the charge. This is supported by the fact that he shot 231 free throws on the year, a very high total for a player at any level, yet he rarely was called for a charge. Moreover, Milligan is an exceptional passer, and is able to thread the needle for passes inside. It has been said time and again that the post entry pass is a lost art in basketball. Milligan knows exactly where to feed post players and is fairly conservative in his approach, opting only to dish inside from the wing. Further, Milligan is dynamic in transition and regularly throws on-point alley oop passes to electrify the crowd.

Standing at 6'2, it is clear that Milligan can play either guard position at the next level. He possesses the handle to convert to a lead guard role, often splitting double teams. Milligan is strong inside and is willing to take his game to the post if at all possible, where he can either connect on a turnaround jumper or bully his way through contact.

Despite these notable strengths on offense, Milligan has the most potential to be a lockdown defender at the next level. Not only does he have the requisite footspeed to keep up with just about anyone, but he has the savvy to closeout players and force them into tough shots. He drives offensive players to their off hand and will often beat them to the spot, forcing them to kick it back out. He also has quick enough hands to get in the passing lanes and finish on breakaway steals. (2.1 steals per game) Finally, in spite of his size at 6'2, Milligan has been known to block shots at the Division III level due to his superior athleticism. (1.2 blocks per game)

Georgio Milligan will be an excellent pickup for whichever team discovers him. He has a great work ethic and the necessary physical tools to succeed at a higher level of basketball.


(Image Sources: Drewacorn.com, Hamilton College Athletics, Mascac.com, University of Chicago Athletics, Nescac.com, and Franklin & Marshall Athletics)

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Scouring the Nation (Part 8)

In this edition of 'Scouring the Nation', I explore two of the top prospects in NAIA Division II- Saint Francis (Ind.)'s Qadr Owens and Huntington University's Caleb Kennedy.



Caleb Kennedy clearly had one of his more remarkable performances against Owens' squad. He was dominant throughout and connected on a very high percentage of his shots. Kennedy's game centers around his crafty post moves. While he is only 6'6, his girth at 215 lbs allows him to maneuver around taller players. At a higher level of basketball, Kennedy will likely still be able to employ his post-up moves. However, he will have to slim down in order to play at a faster pace. With his wide shoulders and strong upper body, Kennedy should be able to still function similarly, even if he has to sacrifice some of his strength.

In the post, Kennedy utilizes an array of drop step and pivot moves in combination with quick jumpers to exploit defenders in the painted area. While his post arsenal is not all that advanced, his savvy around the basket allows him to compensate. While he does need to extend his range, Kennedy regularly pulls up for turnaround jumpers or runners after initially receiving post entry feeds. But, he prefers to create for himself off the dribble. With regard to how this facet of his post game will translate at the professional level, it is clear that he is going to have to minimize the number of times that he puts the ball on the floor. While defenses already converge on him, he would likely struggle maneuvering around higher level athletes on the block. And, he would assuredly turn the ball over more often at the professional level because help defenses in these leagues are far more advanced than anything he has seen in NAIA.

Further, Kennedy is an excellent shooting threat from the mid range. Despite being the focal point of Huntington's offense, he still manages to connect on 51.7% of his field goal attempts. He possesses decent form on his free throws and shoots them at a 70.3% clip, indicating that he has the fundamentals to develop a consistent outside shot. These numbers do not tell the entire story though, as they fail to account for scoring trends. Kennedy tends to dominate in spurts. In his contest with Saint Francis (Ind.), he performed valiantly, but was saddled with foul trouble for some parts of the game; this, in turn, limited his ability to get into a rhythm and ultimately allowed Saint Francis to stage a comeback.

Considering the fact that Kennedy functions primarily as a post option, he rebounds the ball fairly well, especially on the defensive glass. He possesses good box out fundamentals and the intuition to know where the ball is going to land next. Kennedy is also a solid passer. In his contest with Saint Francis (Ind.), he saw several double teams, but was able to dish it to his teammates for easy baskets. Even when he was directly assisting them, his presence commanded significant defensive attention, and this allowed other players to assert themselves when he was in the game.

On the defensive end, there are numerous question marks concerning how Caleb Kennedy will stop quicker forwards at the professional level. While he is capable of moving laterally when defending in the post, the transition to the perimeter might be fairly difficult for him. However, he does have outstanding length, and this enables him to really contest and alter shots at the basket.

Overall, Caleb Kennedy appears to be a good prospect without a definitive position at a higher level of basketball. He must continue to expand his game and improve on his outside shot in order to receive looks from overseas scouts.


On the other end, Qadr Owens demonstrated why he was an All American a season ago. Not only was he able to successfully involve his teammates, but he also displayed his scoring prowess throughout the contest. While he is not a consistent three point shooting option this season (35.4% on the year), he did connect on 4 out of 5 long range shots in this game, attempting decent looks and successfully stretching Huntington's defense. Moreover, he strongly drove to the basket and either set up teammates, or was able to finish through contact. Owens has excellent body control and the upper body strength to complete tough plays around the rim. Further, his solid handle allows him to maneuver around defenders, making him one of the more complete slashers in NAIA basketball.

In terms of his court vision, Owens is a willing passer and successfully set up several of his teammates in this contest. After he drove to the basket and kicked the ball out, though, his teammates would often swing it around the perimeter to an open man, thereby negating some potential assists. However, he oftentimes does make the right pass, and is willing to do whatever it takes to lead his team to victory. Owens is also an exceptional athlete, as evinced by his 5 rebounds per game at 6'1. (may be smaller than his listed height as well)

From a defensive standpoint, Owens was able to shut down his opponents on the perimeter despite his height disadvantage. He even played solid post defense on several occasions, and really forced Caleb Kennedy into some difficult shots. Further, Owens has quick hands and impressive instincts on this end of the floor, which enable him to collect 1.48 steals per game.

Overall, Qadr Owens is one of the more underrated guards in the NAIA. He is a consummate winner who must continue to improve his consistency from beyond the arc. If he can do this and continue to work on his offensive repertoire, he should earn a decent contract overseas.


(Image Sources: Huntington.edu & Naia.cstv.com)

Monday, January 30, 2012

Scouring the Nation (Part 7)

In this segment, I explore two of the leading offensive weapons in Division III, who battled one another in a high scoring affair.

In John Jay College's home contest against Brooklyn College, leading scorer Jerome Alexander really began to assert himself towards the end of the second half. The fifth leading scorer in all of Division III (26.1 ppg) is an aggressive slasher who scores the vast majority of his points attacking the basket. By the mid-way point of the first half, it became clear that the end-to-end tempo really favored his style of play, as he thrived getting to the basket in transition. Alexander possesses a solid first step and an understanding of how to get by his defender with the change-of-pace dribble. He also knows when to utilize the jump stop in order to create space. As such, he is capable of getting around multiple defenders, even in halfcourt sets. And, standing at 6'4, Alexander could potentially develop the ability to shoot over his defenders. In order to do this, however, he must raise the release point on his shot and speed up his shooting motion. Otherwise, he will have to consistently fade away from the basket just to get his shot off. He also must extend his range in order to keep defenses honest.

In terms of his decision making, Alexander made a few careless turnovers driving into traffic once the Brooklyn College's defense converged on him. However, he generally played within himself most of the time, and found open teammates after getting in the lane. At the next level, it is clear that Alexander will thrive beating his man off the dribble and finding open three point shooters. Further, Jerome is a decent athlete who is able to hang and finish through considerable contact. He is also capable of collecting rebounds, particularly on the offensive end, when he decides to assert himself.

From a defensive standpoint, Jerome Alexander has considerable promise if he is able to maintain a consistent focus. Earlier in the first half, Alexander failed to assert himself, lagging behind plays and not really focusing in on perimeter shooters. The 2nd half was a totally different story though. Jerome's defense on Brooklyn's Tyshawn Russell for stretches really sparked John Jay's rally late in the game. In terms of his discernible tools, Alexander possesses good lateral quickness and functions well as a positional defender on the perimeter. However, he must sacrifice his body more often, though, by taking charges.

Overall, Jerome Alexander is one of the top scoring threats in Division III. His ability to attack the basket and create for teammates makes him a valuable player at any level. Alexander also possesses immense potential on the defensive end, but must look to play with the same degree of focus throughout each and every game. While he still must amend certain aspects of his game to be successful at the next level, Alexander has good potential to develop into a solid contributor for a European squad after his collegiate career is behind him.


For the opposing team, Brooklyn College's lead guard Tyshawn Russell really dominated throughout most of the contest, widening his team's margin of victory to twenty points during some stretches. Not only was he capable of playing off the ball and slashing in traffic, but he also took on most of the point guard responsibilities. Much like Alexander, Russell thrives at attacking the basket with his blindingly fast first step. Standing at 5'10, Russell has a slight build, which he willingly throws around whenever he drives to the hoop. Unlike Alexander, though, he usually looks to finish by blowing by defenders at the rim, instead of opting for the pull up jumper. In this contest, Russell completed several spectacular plays, demonstrating that he can contort his body in the air and finish around multiple defenders. Russell possesses exceptional athleticism and is rather dynamic off the bounce. He also has incredible hang-time and the requisite athleticism to play at a higher level of basketball.

When he received the ball on the perimeter, Russell often looked for open teammates, appearing almost hesitant to dial his own number in the second half. He often swung the ball and was not given credit for hockey assists, which nonetheless set his teammates up for open shots. With that said, he does have more turnovers than assists on the year, and this is primarily attributable to his lack of upper body strength. It should be noted that Russell is one of the few options on Brooklyn College that can create their own offense. As such, he often becomes an object of defensive strategies. In order to score during these stretches where he is the subject of the opposing team's defensive focus, Russell must improve his perimeter jumper. On the season, he is connecting on an abysmal 27.8% of his 3 point attempts. While he did nail a few of his attempts from distance in his contest with John Jay College, it is clear that he tends to rush his outside shot at times.

Defensively, Russell has quick hands and was able to push the ball in transition after stealing it from the opposition. He also possesses the lateral quickness to defend at a higher level. However, his lack of upper body strength is alarming, as this will almost certainly be exploited by virtually every other college-level guard who has spent some time in an intense strength training program. Overall, if Russell can improve his physique, he will become stronger with the ball and his assist to turnover ratio will likely normalize as a result. This will ultimately allow him to emerge as a coveted long term prospect for teams competing overseas.

(Images by John Jay College Athletics & C. Gottlieb)