Friday, July 27, 2012

Scouring the Nation (Part 13)

In this addition of "Scouring the Nation", I examine NAIA prospect Fayzon Richey, several other NAIA talents, as well as standouts from NAIA Division II.


Listed as one of my top 30 prospects outside of Division I, 6'3 combo guard Fayzon Richey is one of the better shooters in the nation. He can score in a variety of ways and moves very well off the ball. Richey rubs well off of screens and does a nice job of shooting on the move without his feet completely set. In the contests I watched, he hit several tough, fading pull up jumpers with multiple defenders in his face. Because his squad, Saint Gregory's, does not really have any other serious offensive threats, Richey is an indespensable part of his team's sets. With that said, while he did have several breakout games where he connected on 5 or 6 three point shots (such as the contest where he hit 5 threes and single handedly upset #5 Rogers State), Richey only shot 36.2% from three on the year. If his teammates can learn to create their own shot, Richey will likely shoot a much higher percentage from the field. This is largely due to his textbook mechanics and good lift on his jump shot. This positive shooting mechanics are further captured by his 85.9% free throw shooting percentage (on 184 attemtps). Moreover, Richey is able to square his body to the basket very quickly and connect on deep shots. Because he is such a capable three point shooting threat, Richey implements a believable shot fake, which often draws his defender in the air and can lead to either a foul or an easy layup. Apart from this fundamentally sound maneuver, Richey has a quick first step and is very aggressive going to the basket.

In terms of his overall offensive output, he averaged 21.18 points per game and shot a fairly efficient 47.9% on the year, despite being the attraction of most opposing defenses. When he does drive in the lane and draw two or more defenders, Richey typically shares the ball with his big men, and regularly sets them up for easy baskets. He also willingly kicks the ball out to the perimeter to set up easy three point attempts. Despite his unselfishness, his teammates failed to finish countless plays, and this led his assist numbers to be understated. With that said, if Richey hopes to play some lead guard at a higher level, he must cut down on the 3.00 turnovers per game that he averaged last season. Given how many possessions he had with the ball in his hands, this figure is not all that surprising though. On the defensive end, Richey is pesky, and he gets up into his man, giving him headaches and foiling opposing coaches' gameplans. He has very good lateral quickness and does not reach all that often. Instead, he forces opposing players into very difficult shots, embracing a more positional defensive style ala Shane Battier. With that said, he does have good hands, and was able to collect 1.18 steals per contest. Further, Richey is an adequate help defender, and he really worked hard in the contests I witnessed to cover his teammates' missed rotations. Overall, Fayzon Richey does virtually everything for his Saint Gregory's squad, and is one of the more promising combo guards outside of Division I. He has one more season to prove his mettle on a national scale and potentially draw some NBA draft workouts.

Contrasting Richey's style of play, Lubbock Christian point guard Rashad Sample was one of the best distributors in the nation at the NAIA level last season. This 6'0 lead guard averaged an impressive 6.33 assists per contest and constantly looked to set his teammates up for easy baskets. He found shooters in the corner for open jump shots. Sample also made several flashy no-look passes in the contests that I watched. On one play, he hit an open three point shooter with picture perfect no look set up. Further, he did a great job of executing pick and roll sets, consistently finding his teammates. When carrying out these plays, Sample did a fantastic job of slowing down the tempo, such that the game was played at LCU's pace. While Sample does have a very good handle, he does turn the ball over a bit too much, averaging 3.53 turnovers per contest. Still, this meant that he posted a very good 1.79 to 1 Assist to Turnover Ratio for the year. And, even when he does lose the ball, Sample never really forces the action. Also, he is often able to recover on those possessions and get the ball back. In terms of his offensive efficiency, Sample scores most of his points from inside the arc, and shot a solid 45.5% from the field. He does have a serviceable shooting stroke for pullup jumpers, and can stretch defenses from beyond the arc. With that said, his three point shooting percentage declined from an impressive 49.6% (on a limited 42 attempts) to a mere 31.0% (on 100 attempts). If he continues to develop this aspect of the game, he could conceivably play at a higher level of basketball. Additionally, Sample is a good rebounding guard for his size due to his respectable athleticism, as he averaged 4.13 rebounds per contest. On the defensive end, Sample displayed excellent lateral quickness and reaction timing. He averaged 1.63 steals per contest and does a nice job of shadowing his man. Rashad Sample was one of the better point guards in NAIA basketball last season, and will likely move on to a career overseas if he can improve his perimeter shooting consistency.

Two other players deserve a mention for Lubbock Christian. 6'4 shooting guard Douglas Williams is an electric athlete who benefitted greatly by playing alongside Sample. He shot an efficient 49.6% from the field overall, and 33.7% from beyond the arc. But, Williams generally opted to attack the basket or shoot a pullup jumper from the midrange when he had the ball in his hands. Further, Williams' handle is fairly effective and allows him to blow by defenders. He also has a blazing first step and can put his defender on his heels very quickly. As such, I found it very surprising that Williams only shot 53 free throw attempts last season. If he hopes to play basketball beyond college, he must improve his willingness and aggressiveness to take contact and get to the line. Williams' athleticism also shows through with regard to his rebounding. At 6'4, he led his team with an impressive 5.97 boards per contest. In terms of his ability to distribute the basketball, Williams posted a 0.46 to 1 Assist to Turnover Ratio, which must be improved upon if he hopes to get any playing time at a higher level of basketball. On the defensive end, Williams was versatile enough to defend bigger players. And, he had excellent hands, swiping the ball away from big men who were just about to attack the rim. His 1.37 steals per game demonstrated his impressive athleticism and potential.

Williams' and Samples' frontcourt counterpart Jeff Ayisire displayed some talent on both ends of the floor at times. The 6'4 forward shot a very efficient 57.9% from the field, but did not attempt a long range shot. He must perfect his long range stroke, unless he wants to retain his current position in a lower minor league. In order to do this, Ayisire must improve his shooting mechanics and correct his abysmal 55.8% shooting at the line. And, despite functioning as a forward, Ayisire only averaged 3.80 rebounds per contest. However, he was most impressive on the defensive end, where he, like Williams and Sample, had very quick hands and averaged 1.15 steals per contest. Overall, Ayisire has enough lateral quickness to defend at a high level, but must refine his shooting touch and improve his rebounding figures before he can latch on to a professional squad.

Another one of the leading scorers in NAIA Division I who attracted some attention last season was sophomore transfer Brad Karp. The 6'4 shooting guard averaged 23.59 points per game and displayed tremendous scoring instincts all year long. The former Valpo transfer really left his mark from the field, connecting on a scorching 59.6% of his field goal attempts. From reviewing film, it is clear that Karp scores the ball in a variety of ways. He loves to shoot a runner in the lane, and can even get this shot off through contact. (despite the fact that this shot is normally used to avoid the defender) He can connect on this shot with a great deal of efficiency, but is also willing to drive the ball all the way to the rim, as evinced by his 182 free throw attempts last season. Further, Karp is not afraid to bang inside, and even attempted to post up in the contests that I witnessed. His turnaround jumper could use some work, but he did demonstrate some impressive moves to free himself from his defender. In terms of his ability to get to the rim, Karp must improve on his handle, as he was capable of dribbling past his man in 1 on 1 scenarios, but lost the ball when he was met with double teams. Further, his first step is not very explosive, but he is crafty and skilled enough to get his shot off against virtually anyone. Because of the offensive threat that he poses, he is able to utilize his handle to get him places on the floor. But, if he refines it a bit and learns to implement the change of pace dribble, he can become a more diversified offensive weapon at the next level. Karp is willing to get out and run in transition, and was able to dunk the ball ahead of the pack on numerous occasions.

In terms of his proficiency from beyond the arc, Karp hit a noteworthy 37.5% of his attempts. If he can improve his handle, Karp will likely end up taking less contested three pointers, and, in all likelihood, he will become even more efficient in this facet of the game. In terms of his hustle and leaping ability, Karp was an excellent rebounder for his size and gathered 8.50 rebounds per contest. He was very good on the offensive glass, with nearly half of his rebounds coming on this end. While he is not known for his passing, he does have an Assist to Turnover Ratio that is below 1 to 1, meaning that he needs to distribute the ball more frequently and cut down on his giveaways. In the contests I watched, he tended to lose the ball due to either a sloppy handle or because defenders converged on him when he drove into traffic. On the defensive end, Karp demonstrated decent awareness at times, and has the athleticism to become a serviceable defender at the next level. While he is not quick laterally, he did have the leaping ability and awareness to block 1.09 shots per contest. He also has very good hands, which he regularly turned into transition opportunities, as he picked the pockets of the opposition 1.56 times per game. Karp must learn to play better help defense because he does tend to give up easy baskets instead of switching. Overall, Karp was one of the most dynamic offensive weapons in NAIA Division I last season. He will have two more years to improve his three point shooting efficiency and perfect his handle. In all likelihood, Karp will land on a top flight team overseas due to his diverse skillset.

Two of Karp's teammates also stood out, and will spend another season playing for Saint Xavier (Illinois). Lead guard Anthony Grant is a sparkplug that generally does his damage coming off the bench. Grant is a slasher who is very quick moving towards the basket, and is strong enough to finish through contact. His superior first step allows him to get to the basket in half court situations, but he is also capable of beating the opposition down the floor. As such, Grant is effective in transition and is more than capable of getting to the line. In the contests I watched, he tended to change the pace of the game when he was functioning as his team's lead guard, opting to score on run outs or to simply catch his defenders off guard. He also is capable of scoring on post up opportunities, and he used his strength advantage to overpower slower and weaker point guards. His back to the basket post moves are very similar to Kobe's stylistically (only), as he can connect on fadeaway jumpers or utilize superior footwork to get to the basket with swift maneuvers.

On the year, Grant scored often, averaging 13.07 points per game on 53.1% shooting from the floor. His efficiency is largely attributable to his ability to hit jumpers on the move as well as from the mid range. Grant will likely not have to improve his shooting form at the next level, as he shot 79.2% at the line. However, Anthony Grant must look to extend his range to keep defenses honest. At the next level, he will face quicker defenders and given his current style of play, they will have an easy time anticipating his moves on offense. If he can learn to connect from long range and shoot more frequently from that distance (28.6% on 14 attempts last year), then he may be an effective weapon for a team in the minor leagues or in the Americas. While Grant did post an Assist to Turnover Ratio above 1 to 1, he must look to fill the role of point guard more frequently. Because his teammate Green starts as the lead guard, Grant often does not obtain a role as a lead distributor, as evinced by his 1.76 assists per contest. On the defensive end, Grant is extremely effective and is able to lock down opposing point guards due to his combination of lateral quickness and good hands. He hounds offensive players by effectively shadowing them in man to man scenarios, and he is rather physical when the player he is guarding receives the ball. Further, his quick hands allowed him to collect a solid 1.35 steals per contest last season. With that said, he is primarily a positional defender who uses his superior lateral quickness to shut down the opposition. Overall, Grant is a player who must work on his range and his passing. However, he is already a sparkplug scorer who can energize a team and really get after the ball on defense.

Aside from Grant, Saint Xavier uses 5'9 Roosevelt Green as their primary point guard and starter. This junior has many positive aspects to his game, but must look to cut some weight in order to be able to keep up with the faster pace at the professional level. With that said, he has adequate speed for the NAIA I level, and is very intelligent with the ball in his hands. Green usually opts to make the right plays, as evinced by his 2.74 to 1 Assist to Turnover Ratio. And, he normally looks for his teammates first, enabling him to average an excellent 6.24 assists per contest. Green does a nice job of feeding the post, but is also a willing distributor on the perimeter, where he often finds open three point shooters. In the contests I watched, Green hit post players streaking to the basket with 'pinpoint' bounce passes. Green also has a very good handle- he is strong with the ball in his hands and often shields it with his body, preventing most players from taking the ball away. Green is not shy taking contact either, as he occasionally runs through screens or picks up offensive fouls when he is too overly aggressive. While he can get to the basket and create opportunities for himself and others, Green struggles finishing at the rim, as demonstrated by his paltry 38.2% field goal percentage. He must improve in this area if he hopes to continue playing at a higher level. Additionally, he must perfect his three point shot and not attempt awkward set shots which might be easily blocked. Green connected on a mere 33.1% of his attempts a season ago. If he picks his spots more wisely and stops shooting under duress, he should be able to improve his efficiency significantly. On the defensive end, Green has some of the best hands in NAIA Division I. He averaged 2.17 steals per contest and was effective at poking the ball away or playing the passing lanes. With that said, his lateral quickness is good, but not great, meaning that he may have to gamble at the next level to achieve the same level of effectiveness taking the ball away. Overall, Green is a player who must look to become more efficient and improve his shot selection; otherwise, he makes very good decisions with the ball in his hands and would be a viable option playing in the minor leagues or in the Americas somewhere.

Another major NAIA standout (other than Richey, Sample, and Karp) is Olivet Nazarene's Antonio Marshall. The 5'9 Marshall plays way taller than his listed height and is dynamic on both ends of the floor with his tremendous quickness and athleticism. Marshall has some of the best vision of players in the NAIA, and has used this to execute very difficult plays. He averaged 4.58 assists per game last season and posted a 1.89 to 1 Assist to Turnover ratio, indicating that he limited his turnovers. In terms of his passing repertoire, drawing from the contests I witnessed, Marshall made an unbelievable Lebron James-esque one handed pass from the one baseline on the in bounds all the way downcourt for an open layup. On another play, he turned the ball over but snatched the opposing player's pass out of the air and returned it for a layup. These two instances indicate his above average combination of vision and athleticism. Further, Marshall regularly makes fundamentally sound post entry feeds using the bounce. He also shares the ball around the perimeter and hits open shooters, particularly when he is able to secure deep positioning near the basket. Marshall has a very quick first step and is crafty with his dribble. He employs hesitation and stop and go moves, which enable him to get to the basket early and often. A year ago, he was able to draw 139 free throws and he connected on 87.1% of his attempts.

In terms of his shooting ability, Marshall is very streaky, but can be deadly when he catches fire. He shot 36.6% from beyond the arc and 45.5% from the floor last season. In the contests I watched, he was able to knock down NBA range three point shots off the dribble and off of screens. He only needs a little bit of daylight to release his shot, and his confidence from making jumpers reverberates through to impact other facets of his game; once he has hit a few contested jumpers, he then becomes more aggressive driving to the basket and plays with a greater fluidity. Further, Marshall has great potential to achieve success in the pick and roll game, and regularly fed his teammate, Streets, after the big man set ball screens. Due to his athleticism, Marshall is also a very good rebounder for his size- he averaged 4.32 boards per contest last year and was effective on the offensive glass, helping his team secure second chance points. On the defensive end, Marshall is very aggressive and has the lateral quickness to stay with most players. He does tend to play overly aggressive at times, and this may limit his playing time. However, he averaged an impressive 1.81 steals per contest and was dynamic locking down some of the opposition's point guards. He regularly took his steals the other way for an easy two points, turning them into transition opportunities. On the whole, Antonio Marshall is one of the better guards in the NAIA and he has a real chance to assert himself on a professional level if he can improve as a long range shooter and cut down on the number of fouls that he commits.

Teammate Brandon Streets is a very impressive role player who, at 6'7, is a bit undersized, but like Marshall, affects the game in a variety of ways. Streets does a nice job of posting up inside, and regularly attacks the body of opposing players, thereby picking up fouls. While he played in less than half of his team's contests, he had 92 free throw attempts on the year, which meant that he shot 5.41 free throws per game. Streets has an array of moves that he goes to in the post with varying degrees of success. He is best when sealing his man on the block and then reverting to a spin move inside. Because he is so physical in establishing position, he often draws a foul before even receiving the ball in the post. Streets has very good footwork on his back-to-the-basket opportunities, and prefers to use the glass whenever he can. Further, Streets moves well without the ball, cutting to the basket for easy lay up opportunities. And, he has shown signs that he could be effective in pick and roll scenarios. Streets is also an adequate passer out of the post or on the perimeter, where he makes very good post entry feeds. He averaged 3.29 assists per contest and posted a 1.47 to 1 Assist to Turnover Ratio, indicating that he was a viable threat either to score or involve one of his teammates. His positive decision making is a quality that differentiates Streets from some of the other post players in the NAIA. Additionally, this solid basketball IQ enabled him to pick his spots and shoot 55.0% for the year. Streets understands his limitations and regularly turned down open perimeter jumpers in the contests I saw; moreover, he only attempted five three point field goals all year. At a higher level of play, he must improve his long distance and mid range shooting, as his ability to stretch defenses will be more critical as a professional. Streets is a good rebounder who boxes out and vies for position inside. He averaged a respectable 7.35 boards per game and was effective at grabbing both offensive and defensive rebounds. On the defensive end, Streets functioned predominantly as a positional defender a year ago, stepping in for charges and giving offensive players headaches. He really disrupted Karp's offensive flow when guarding him and picked up several turnovers on him. Streets has good hands and lateral quickness, and this helped him to collect 0.94 steals per contest. Overall, Streets is an elite role player who understands his limitations and is effective as a hustle player and a position defender. He is not a bad option for any team looking for an intelligent role player.

Aside from the aforementioned talent present at the NAIA Division I level, other standouts in NAIA II really caught my attention. Noted as one of the top talents in NAIA Division II, Mike Kennedy stands out in a number of ways. The undersized 6'6 power forward was one of the best post options for his level of play. He utilizes his wide base (220 lbs) to clear space on the block, where he finishes utilizing good footwork. However, he functions primarily as a faceup 4, who looks to receive the ball around the free throw line and then drive it in. While his handle could use some work, it is serviceable enough to allow him to get to the rim. Additionally, he is deceptively quick off the dribble and can get to the rim in a hurry; he utilized this quickness advantage against more lumbering big men. Kennedy is constantly in attack mode when playing and finishes tip ins and is athletic enough to score over players after grabbing offensive rebounds. Due to the quality of shots that he was accustomed to taking, Kennedy finished shooting an efficient 51.0% from the field on 465 field goal attempts. As a result of his attack mentality, Kennedy got to the line a lot last season, shooting 195 free throws and making an average 70.3% of those attempts. Kennedy has room to grow at the line. Additionally, he is capable of stepping out and hitting the perimeter jumper as well, but usually was able to get deep post positioning or easy baskets closer to the rim. He must extend his range, though, as he will be asked to play on the perimeter more often at a higher level. He shot a mediocre 30.8% from three point range this past season. In terms of his effort on the glass, Kennedy is a very good rebounder, who cleans up on the offensive end and exhibits ideal box out fundamentals. He averaged 8.74 rebounds per game, 42.8% of which were on the offensive end. Because he was a dominant post scorer this past season, he often received double teams. And, Kennedy was more than capable of passing out of these situations, averaging 2.21 Assists per game and posting a 1 to 1 Assist to Turnover Ratio, a figure which can be improved upon - especially if he does not function as the focal point of an offense at the next level. On the defensive end, Kennedy is deceptively quick and athletic, blocking 0.59 shots per game and stealing the ball 1.50 times per contest. In the contests I watched, Kennedy got up and blocked three shots as a help defender. Moreover, he has quick hands for a player his size, and he picked the pockets of multiple players. Further, he is aggressive denying in the post and uses his low center of gravity to his advantage, 'chesting' players out of position and further out onto the perimeter. Overall, Mike Kennedy is a complete, undersized forward who must improve his jumper if he hopes to land with a good team overseas. He has the skillset to play at a higher level, but he must adjust to a different position and learn to defend quicker players.

Kennedy's backcourt mate Nicholas Frazier was one of the most promising freshman in the nation outside of Division I this season, and was a top 3 freshman in NAIA Division II. The 6'2 lead guard has good height and awareness for a point guard, and has the chance to develop into one of the better players in the nation. Frazier does an excellent job of distributing the ball inside, and he hit Kennedy regularly. He made several impressive crosscourt passes in the contests that I watched as well. And, when it came down to crunch time for his team, Frazier played with poise, swinging the ball around the perimeter and not forcing the action down the stretch. With that said, Frazier averaged only 1.88 assists and 1.85 turnovers per contest. He must look to establish himself as a full time point guard next season despite his impressive shooting numbers. A year ago, Frazier shot a scorching 47.0% from three point range, one of if not the best mark for a freshman at any level. Frazier is able to get his own shot and picks his spots on the floor. When he was not lighting it up on the perimeter, Frazier did a nice job of taking the ball to the rim, dunking on players and getting to the line as well. He got to the line 156 times last year, but only converted on 67.9% of those attempts. He will likely improve on this percentage next season, as he does have a very good shooting stroke. Further, Frazier has remarkable athleticism for a player at this level. This coupled with his solid handle allowed him to get anywhere he wanted to on the floor, enabling him to shoot 54.6% from the field last season. On the defensive end, Frazier was an effective position defender who did not reach very often. He averaged only 0.79 steals per game, but was active locking down his man. His good height and length should allow him to succeed at this level and the next. Overall, Frazier is one of the most promising young players at the NAIA Division II level, and he has a chance to become the best player at this level in a couple of years if he continues to develop as a point guard. And, his ideal size and skillset will allow him to compete at a higher level of play once he graduates.

Other than Kennedy and Frazier, St. Louis College of Pharmacy standout Shawn Menckowski is a fundamentally sound combo guard with an ability to distribute the basketball. He was the focal point in his team's offense and averaged 20.38 points per game, despite being on the receiving end of defensive traps and collapsing defenses. Menckowski is effective working off the dribble, implementing a change of pace dribble to get by his man. He is fairly crafty in this respect and is agile enough to get by his man in spite of his mediocre first step. He normally lulls his man to sleep before making a quick move to the rim. With that said, Menckowski predominantly uses his right hand to break defenders down and must learn to switch to his off hand when attacking the basket- otherwise he will be too predictable at the next level. Menckowski does a good job of involving his teammates, and is willing to dish the ball off when driving to the basket. In the contests I watched, he was crafty with his passes and rarely got the ball stolen when he committed to distributing the ball. Additionally, he made several pretty wrap around passes to cutting big men in these games. He also understands when to feed outside shooters, and set them up for open shots on numerous occasions.

Even though he is capable of getting his teammates involved, he does not always opt to make the easy pass or reset his team's offense. He instead tends to force the action when a play breaks down. Despite his strong handle, Menckowski received several double teams and closeouts from help defenders when he faced IU East. They were able to throw him off guard after he beat his initial defender and he attempted a jump shot. He must learn to improvise more on the court and not settle for the play that he initially committed to. For instance, on the aforementioned play, he likely could have distributed the ball inside, but instead settled for a contested jumper. As a result of these poor decisions where he was stuck committing to a particular move, he posted a 0.637 to 1 Assist to Turnover Ratio. Additionally, he tended to force quick shots on the perimeter. He connected on 36.3% of his three point attempts last season and this percentage should have been higher given his poor shot selection. It should be noted that Menckowski is a deadly shooter when given the time to set up his shot. He hit 78.7% of his free throw attempts, and has good form on his set shots. However, Menckowski struggles shooting off the dribble because he often rushes shots when defenses collapse. As a result, he shot a paltry 39.7% from the field. It also should be noted that he employs very nice pump fakes that often get the defender in the air. He is very creative in this element of the game. On the defensive end, Menckowski is average to below average laterally and he is lazy on closeout shooters. He has decent hands, but must put in more consistent effort on the defensive end. Overall, Menckowski is a an interesting player with glaring strengths and weaknesses which can be improved upon. If he can continue to develop his basketball savvy and work on his shot selection, he may be able to play overseas somewhere.

His teammate, Luke O'Brien excelled in many of the areas that Menckowski struggled in this past season. O'Brien generally played under control for the most part and posted a 1.12 to 1 Assist to Turnover Ratio. He typically made the easy passes and generally involved everyone in the offense, rarely playing "hero" basketball. O'Brien has a decent first step, but has an average handle, and as such, generally tends to attack on straight line drives to the basket. He does a nice job moving without the ball and is usually an option out of trapping situations, as he regularly moves towards the ball. O'Brien, much like Menckowski, involves his big men in the offense, and he makes fundamental post entry feeds. O'Brien does a nice job of drawing fouls relative to the number of shots he attempts from the floor. (68 FT attempts compared to 127 FG attempts) On the defensive end, O'Brien gets his hands in the passing lanes and is a pesky defender. He can step in and take charges and he also has the hands to strip players of the ball, which he did several times to all NAIA II standout Marcus Isaac. He is quick laterally and a very good weapon on this end. Overall, O'Brien is a fundamentally sound role player who may be able to succeed in minor league basketball.

Mount Vernon Nazarene point guard Robbie Taylor was one of the more underrated players in the NAIA Division II this past season. While he did not garner any national accolades, he was one of the more fundamentally sound players in the nation at his level and he did everything for his team. Not only was he a capable offensive weapon, but Taylor also did a nice job of distributing the ball to his teammates and getting everyone involved in the action. Statistically, he averaged a solid 3.59 assists per contest. He hit cutters on a regular basis, and even threaded the needle on occasion to hit post players for easy baskets. He consistently fed open three point shooters, setting them up for easy attempts. He was most effective at this after getting in the lane and drawing the defense towards him. And, despite the fact that the ball was constantly in his hands, he posted a 1.55 to 1 Assist to Turnover Ratio, which is fairly good given his circumstances. Considering his size, at 5'11, he was a good rebounding guard, finishing with 3.28 boards per contest.

Offensively, Taylor was not as efficient from the field as he should have been, connecting on a paltry 42.1% of his field goal attempts. With that said, teams began to converge on him, particularly later in the season, when they realized that he was one of the only players for Mount Vernon Nazarene who could create his own shot. Taylor possesses a fairly quick first step and the upper body strength to finish through contact. He exhibited good body control in the contests that I watched him play, and would make running one handed layups by shielding the ball with his body and drawing 'And 1' opportunities. With that said, Taylor must improve his mid range game and work on his shot selection, even though he played such a crucial role for his squad. His step back jumper in particular could use some work and he air balled several attempts that I witnessed. If he is able to latch on to a team overseas, he will likely function as a complimentary player and will probably not have to deal with defenses geared towards primarily stopping him. As such, he will have to become more efficient from the field and look to improve on his 35.6% 3 point %, which was fairly good considering the degree of difficulty of his shots and the sheer number of attempts. (160 3pt attempts) Taylor is also versatile moving without the ball, and was able to score off of backdoor basket cuts when he did not have the ball in his hands. Finally, Taylor is also effective functioning as a post option, and was able to exploit strength mismatches on occasion, utilizing a combination of power post moves as well as a turnaround shot when he was met by the help defense.

On the defensive end, Taylor displayed excellent tendencies and functioned as a ball hawk for his team. Not only is he strong enough to move players off their spots, but he has quick enough hands to deflect the basketball. As such, he was one of the leading ball thieves in NAIA Division II with 2.00 steals per contest. Taylor exhibited good quickness and nice defensive fundamentals, forcing point guards to give up the ball and leading his team on effort plays. Further, he followed his man off the ball and prevented any layup opportunities. Overall, Taylor was one of the more underappreciated leaders on the court this past season despite his poor efficiency. He created for his teammates, rebounded the ball, and played soundly on the defensive end. Taylor should be able to play abroad if he can cut down on his turnovers and continue to improve his shooting from the floor.


On the opposite end of the spectrum, Aaron Evans did a good job of leading his team and actually achieved some success and attention nationally. When he went head-to-head with Taylor, he was able to effectively distribute the ball to his teammates, making a nice one handed pass to a cutting big man. He did a decent job of driving inside and drawing fouls when Taylor was not on him. However, he struggled to stay in front of Taylor and was forced to the bench with foul trouble. With that contest in mind, Evans was a much more efficient player year round for his squad. While he did on occasion take contested fadeaway jumpers, his shot selection was very good and he connected on 49.4% of his attempts, fairly efficient for a player who always had the ball in his hands. And while Evans does not have ideal range (32.9% from 3), he does have good form on his shot and has the potential to become a good long range shooter if he puts the time in. His 77.9% free throw percentage was very good, and he was able to get to the line fairly regularly. In terms of his ability to distribute the basketball, Evans averaged 3.03 assists per contest and was able to involve his teammates. He did not always opt for hockey assists and was willing to pass the ball around the perimeter to help orchestrate plays and throw opposing defenses off. He did turn the ball over a little too much at times, but his 1.44 to 1 Assist to Turnover Ratio was fairly good considering how often he created offense for his squad. However, he must learn to prevent himself from jumping in the air when he makes passes because this really increases the number of turnovers that he commits. On the offensive end, Evans does a good job of getting to the rim and finishing inside, weaving through traffic and often scoring over bigger players. He is capable of finishing with either hand and is deceptively quick attacking the basket. Evans likes to score on reverse layups as well. Defensively, he does tend to get caught in the air and regularly bites on pump fakes. However, he has decent recovery speed and is able to block some shots if his defender gets in front of him. He has average lateral quickness on the defensive end, though, and does not project as anything more than an intelligent defender at the next level. Overall, Evans is a great leader who scores efficiently and is deceptive with his quickness and athleticism. He should find a home somewhere after this coming season.

Another sought after player who matched up with Aaron Evans was Grace (Ind.)'s Bruce Grimm Jr. Grimm Jr. has good potential as a jump shooter at the next level if he can refine his shot selection and learn to not get so frustrated when his shots are not falling. In his matchup with Evans, Grimm Jr. displayed a nice release on his shot, and was able to get it off in no time. He did a nice job of coming off of screens and forcing his defenders into them. And, even when it appeared like he was going to attempt an off balance shot, he was able to square his body to the basket, which improved his chances considerably. With that said, Bruce Grimm Jr. must improve his shot selection- he connected on a paltry 40.7% of his field goal attempts and 30.7% of his three point attempts. With those percentages, he would not likely obtain a central role in any offense at the next level. However, his good form and consistency on his shot demonstrate that he likely underwent significant shooting slumps this season and may be able to play better in the future. In terms of his point guard abilities, Grimm Jr. averaged 4.31 assists per contest and was able to get the ball down low with some consistency. With that said, he needs to cut down on his 3.00 turnovers per game and become a more reliable decision maker. Further, when a defensive player limits him like Evans did on the occasion I watched, he tended to get frustrated and began to attempt difficult shots. He missed fadeaway 14 Footers and difficult shots off of one of two dribbles with a defender in his face. This frustration eventually culminated in a technical foul. As such, he must continue to learn to control his emotions on the court and look to make more sound decisions with the ball in his hands. On the defensive end, Grimm Jr. has good quickness and very good hands. He was able to gather 1.63 steals per contest and was always a threat in the passing lanes. Overall, Grimm Jr. is an improving player who will have one more season to prove his mettle and assert himself as a solid player on a national scale.


Grace (Ind.)'s Duke Johnson is also an intriguing prospect who may have a shot to make an overseas roster for this coming season. It is very rare that you find a nimble 6'11 big man with a decent skillset at this level of play. Johnson has the potential to receive playing time for an overseas squad if he can continue to improve and work on his weaknesses. In the contests I watched, Johnson was able to catch the ball on some poor post feeds by his teammates. He has decent hands and was able to grab passes which should have gone out of bounds. On the offensive end, Johnson is nimble and employs his shoulders to shrug off his man and score. He has good face up post moves and is able to drive past defenders with good quickness. He also has a decent looking running hook in his post arsenal and could get this shot over most of the competition in NAIA Division II. Further, he finished well near the basket, and connected on 51.9% of his field goal attempts. He also has a good shooting form and the potential to develop a jump shot to stretch the defenses. He shot 73.6% from the line and has a nice touch on his shots. With all this in mind, however, Johnson is way behind in terms of his strength around the basket. He must put on considerable weight to bang with professional defenders, as he struggled to hold position on the block against undersized players. He struggled to finish through contact most of the time, and had difficulty sealing his man. Additionally, while he has good size, he is a very poor rebounder due to his strength limitations, as he averaged only 6.47 rebounds per contest this season. Johnson does possess good box out fundamentals, but he struggles to hold position due to his lack of bulk. With that said, he is also a strong passer with 2.23 assists per contest, kicking the ball out to open three point shooters and always keeping his head up, even when posting up. On the defensive end, he is a mixed bag as well. He averaged 1.20 blocks and 0.77 steals per contest, and was strong deflecting the basketball. He regularly changed shots and made several good help-side recoveries to block shots. He has good quickness and is able to cover a lot of ground in a limited period of time. However, like many shot blockers, he does have a tendency to bite on fakes and has strength concerns are also applicable here. He allows players to obtain deep post position due to his poor lower body strength and is more of a positional defender in the post. His lateral quickness is not great either, but he compensates with good length and recovery instincts. Overall, Duke Johnson is one of the more intriguing players at this level of basketball, and should be able to make a roster somewhere due to his potential if he can hit the weight room and add some girth.

Davenport's men's basketball squad also produced several talents who may be able to continue to play at the professional level. 6'2 guard James Nelson was the catalyst behind his team's high octane offense. He typically functioned off the ball, but was able to look ahead in transition and provide his teammates with open layups. With that said, Nelson will likely play off the ball at the next level given the fact that he averaged below a 1 to 1 Assist to Turnover Ratio. (2.33 Assists and 2.42 Turnovers per game) In spite of this weakness, Nelson was one of the more dynamic offensive weapons in NAIA Division II. He is capable of employing stutter step dribble moves and has the handle to get to the rim and finish among traffic. Nelson is athletic enough to finish on up and under drives. He also utilizes a fairly reliable runner when he is looking to avoid contact. Additionally, he is a very good jump shooter, who can pull up from beyond the arc or dial in from mid range. He has a good rotation on his shot and is efficient shooting the ball, connecting on 42.9% of his three point attempts and 49.8% of his field goal attempts overall. Further, Nelson is aggressive when he has the ball in his hands and gets to the line fairly often, hitting 73.1% of his 134 free throw attempts. Nelson's good athleticism and quick first step allow him to get to the rim often. But, these qualities also help him on the glass, where he is one of the most dynamic rebounders at his size, averaging 4.83 boards per contest. (27.5% of which were on the offensive glass) Defensively, Nelson is quick laterally and very aggressive going after the basketball. He does tend to leave his feet at times, but he typically is one of the more capable one on one defenders on his squad. Nelson regularly turns steals into open transition baskets, and he averaged a solid 1.69 steals per contest last year. Overall, Nelson is one of the more dynamic combo guards that I have covered. He is effective at many different facets of the game, but must learn to play some point guard if he hopes to obtain playing time in some of the top leagues overseas.

Fellow All American James Humphrey is one of the best prospects coming out of NAIA Division II. He is a very athletic, 6'8 forward with an inside-outside game that will allow him to play somewhere this coming season. As a result of his physical gifts, Humphrey is a very good defender and is particularly effective blocking shots. This past year he averaged 1.76 blocks and 0.89 steals per contest. Not only is this a testament to his timing and quick hands, but it also reemphasizes the fact that he is a very good athlete. In the contests I watched, Humphrey displayed very good recovery speed and was able to get up very quickly to block several shots. As a result, he should function well as a help defender at the next level. On the offensive end, Humphrey is a very efficient player who understands his limitations. For instance, he rarely forces shots and often passes the ball around the perimeter instead of taking contested jumpers. He also cleans up on the glass regularly and has the athleticism to attack the basket off the dribble. On one occasion, he implemented a nice pump fake and then drove all the way to the hoop and skied for a dunk. In terms of his prowess on the boards, he averaged a solid 5.92 rebounds per contest, which was good considering the fact that his fellow teammates were also active. Further, Humphrey is aggressive in the post and can make post passes to open teammates. He gets to the basket well, but usually prefers to take jumpers unless he is very close to the rim. Humphrey has a nice stroke and his range extends well past the college three point line. He was efficient from the floor last season, hitting 48.5% of his shots from the floor and 42.1% of his three point attempts. He was an active threat from behind the arc and attempted 107 3 pointers last season. At the next level, this bodes well for his versatility and ability to stretch defenses. Overall, Humphrey is one of the more dynamic weapons in NAIA Division II basketball, and should be retained by a professional squad next season due to his combination of size, athleticism, and expanding skillset.

Fellow senior Damacious White was also impressive in the contests that I watched. This senior pretty much did it all. He moved well without the ball, he rebounded, he implemented ball fakes, he attacked the basket, he defended, and he even nailed several three point baskets. Offensively, White is very dynamic moving without the ball and often scores easy baskets off of cuts as a result. When he does receive the ball on the perimeter or around the free throw line, White is excellent at getting to the basket and drawing contact. He has good hangtime and athleticism and is able to utilize these physical gifts as well as his basketball IQ to exploit defenders. In the contests that I watched, he regularly employed a ball fake and used it to get defenders in the air and draw fouls. On the year, he was good at getting to the line (101 attempts), but he only connected on 61.4% of his free throw attempts. This must improve for him to find a spot at the next level. White is able to finish through contact at times and usually looks to score even when he anticipates getting hit, and has an array of moves contorting his body to overpower his defender and score even after he is fouled. He has mastered the up and under move when driving to the basket as well. When he is not attacking the basket, White shot the ball well from the field this past season. While he does have a flat shot (and a form similar to Ashton Gibbs's), White was able to connect on 48.3% of his field goal attempts and 42.0% of his shots from behind the arc. He has a decent shot selection when shooting from long range, and this has helped with the development of his shot fake. White must continue to work on his shooting mechanics and follow through every time so that he can get the roll on shots closer to the rim. In terms of his passing ability, while he is not a pure point guard and does not set his teammates up very often, he did post a 1.47 to 1 Assist to Turnover Ratio, largely because of his lack of mistakes on the offensive end. He protects the ball well and kicks it out or works the ball around the perimeter when he cannot find an open shot. Defensively, White applies ferocious ball pressure and is able to stay in front of his man. He has good hands and averaged 1.22 steals per contest. Overall, White had a great season for one of the best and deepest teams in NAIA Division II. If he can continue to shoot at the same rate, he will be able to parlay his success last season into a role off the bench somewhere. At 6'0 in height, he is not quite a pure point guard, but he could provide a scoring punch off of the bench for a team looking for a weapon.

Sophomore teammate JaVontae Ford is cut from the same cloth as White and Nelson, and played in a similar role last season. This 6'3 forward was versatile and helped his team in a variety of different ways. He will likely obtain a much larger role in the offense next season, and could become one of the better players in NAIA Division II if he puts the time in to improve during this offseason. Ford demonstrated last season that he can score efficiently, while also getting his teammates involved. He regularly made some nice plays to cutters inside. This lefty was also to push the ball in transition and get by his defender with quick moves to the basket. He has very good speed and athleticism, and got to the line 104 times last year. This figure should have been more, but he shared the ball with his teammates, and this chemistry gave Davenport one of the best backcourts in the country. Ford has decent hesitation moves and catches defenders off guard with his change of pace dribble. He does a nice job of pushing the ball and can finish in transition on alley oop opportunities. Ford was efficient from the floor and shot 48.1% from the field. He was also rather good at hitting catch and shoot long range opportunities, as he does a nice job of squaring to the basket. Ford shot a very efficient 43.2% from beyond the three point line, (on 199 attempts) and he displayed an effective and consistent shooting form. Because of this, he was able to capitalize on most of his trips to the line, hitting 77.9% of his free throws. Ford was a good rebounder for his size as well due to his solid athleticism. He averaged 4.61 rebounds per contest, and was particularly effective on the defensive glass. In spite of these strengths, Ford will need to continue to work on his decision making, as his 0.84 Assist to Turnover Ratio was not good at all. If he is going to play at a higher level, he also must learn to play some lead guard. Seeing as he is functioning as a forward, this transition will not likely be without its hiccups. But, Ford has two years to learn how to play the 1 and 2 effectively, and he will be thrust in to a go-to role next season, with the previous three players mentioned graduating. On the defensive end, Ford has good hands and is quick enough laterally to stay with most players at this level. He averaged 1.33 steals per game, and he was very good at disrupting ball handlers. Overall, Ford is an efficient scorer who must learn to involve his teammates and grow into an identifiable positional niche. If he can move away from the forward slot and continue shooting efficiently while cutting back on turnovers, he will be a nice prospect to check back on in a few years.

Undersized bruiser Rocko Holmes matched up well with James Humphrey when they faced each other. Standing at a burly 6'5 275 lbs, Holmes does a great job maneuvering in the post. He typically shields his defender with his body, putting him on his back, and scores past him with the off hand. Holmes has a good understanding of positioning and is skilled enough to utilize spacing to create offensive opportunities. He works to get open on in bounds plays and he vies for positioning off the ball, which leads to easy opportunities when his backcourt mates keep their heads up. Holmes is extremely strong in the post, and uses this lower body strength to muscle his way against some of the best defenders at his position. He creates space with his body and does a nice job of drawing fouls. He had 163 free throw attempts last season. On the low block, Holmes has good post footwork, but occasionally uses the wrong hand. Additionally, he tends to turn the ball over when he is met by double teams. He must improve in this respect, as he averaged under a 0.50 Assist to Turnover Ratio last year. In terms of his efficiency, Holmes shot a solid 54.5% from the floor and picked his spots well, opting to kick the ball out on double teams to open shooters. However, Holmes must look to extend his range and develop more of a mid range jumper if he hopes to play at a professional level. While he only shot 69.3% at the line, he does evince good form on his shot and may be able to develop a good stroke from the perimeter. In terms of his other strengths, Holmes is effective rebounding the ball because he utilizes good box out fundamentals, collecting 7.97 boards per contest. On the defensive end, Holmes struggles to defend bigger players because of his lack of height. He averaged only 0.53 blocks and steals per game, and this is largely due to the fact that he functions primarily as a positional defender. Holmes must cut some weight in order to draw charges at the next level and get into position with swift lateral movements. At this stage, his weight does not always allow him to get to spots against some of the better interior athletes. Overall, Holmes had a solid senior season, but must look to transform his game in order to play at a higher level of basketball.

In addition to Holmes, three point marksman Trenton Stutzman had a very efficient year for Sterling College (Kansas). He connected on a scorching 44.8% of his 252 three point attempts. Stutzman is a very streaky scorer who can go off on any given night- for instance, his 9 three point makes against both Bethany (Kansas) and Kansas Wesleyan were a reminder that he can shoot even while contested. Stutzman does a nice job of getting his shot off around screens and is capable enough in using his dribble to get himself free. He moves very well without the ball, and with the loss of Goodrich from a season before, he received more play calls and clearly benefitted. Stutzman employs a nice shot fake and can hit the turnaround jumper when inside the arc. He does not have good change of pace handles, but he is fairly quick going both right and left in a straight line motion. This means that he can get to the hoop in a hurry, but may struggle to create separation against elite level defenders. However, even in a complimentary role, Stutzman is capable of squaring his body on three point attempts, and thus is a serious threat to fill it up from the outside. Stutzman can get to the rim, but he is not particularly keen on getting all the way to the basket. He typically dishes the ball off to his big man Brazelton or tries to draw a foul. On the year, he connected on 46.2% of his field goal attempts, but 73.25% of those shots were from beyond the arc. At 6'0, Stutzman is going to have to learn to play some lead guard. He already is fairly ball dominant, but he needs to average more than 1.29 assists per game, and even more importantly must cut down on his 1.61 turnovers per contest. On the defensive end, Stutzman has very good fundamentals, and is quick enough laterally to stay with most defenders. He is undersized at 6'0, so he may struggle if players shoot over him, as he tends to get low in his stance. At times, he did not always revert to his stance, but this was not all that often. Occasionally, he is blown by after receiving a hard pick, and he does not have good recovery instincts. However, Stutzman has good hands and reflexes, and is able to deflect and steal the basketball. He averaged an impressive 1.52 steals per contest this past season and was a menace poking the ball away. Overall, Stutzman was one of the more improved players this past season, but his height and lack of point guard skills limit his ceiling. He may be able to land on a good team due to his three point marksmanship, but he must learn to impact the game in other ways and look to finish at the rim more often.


Stutzman's teammate Cody Brazelton is another undersized forward with good athleticism and a nice motor- somewhat similar to Caleb Kennedy. Cody is an efficient weapon on the offensive end, as he shot 54.4% from the floor and scored in a variety of ways. Brazelton was capable as a back to the basket player, but he tends to take a while to get into his repertoire. As a result, he tends to turn the ball over when the double teams come over. Brazelton is very active inside and likes to get his hand around everything moving towards the rim. He cuts hard to the basket and is available for easy buckets most of the time. However, he is also very quick and has a serviceable enough handle to function as a faceup player as well. On several occasions, Brazelton protected the ball well against some of the opposition's guards and finished at the rim. On one trip, Brazelton used his superior athleticism by moving from the block all the way to the three point line to gather a steal. Then he went coast to coast dribbling past two guards and scoring at the rim. Not only does he have good anticipatory instincts, but he is very aggressive attacking the basket, and this allowed him to get to the line at a notable clip. (173 Free throw attempts last season) He has good fundamentals attacking the basket, and his believable shot fake enables him to draw fouls at a high rate. Despite his activity, Brazelton is an average rebounder and gathered 6.87 boards per game. However, he is very active on the offensive glass, and he collected many of his rebounds on this end. (35.6%) With that said, his lack of height may seriously hurt his chances to play at a much higher level. Despite this, Brazelton was excellent on the defensive end, not overplaying and really shutting down his man. Not only did he shut down Wes Jones in the second half, but he also was great as a help defender. He blocked countless up and under layups in the games that I watched, and had the vertical explosion to get up quickly. On the year, he averaged 1.03 blocks per contest. All in all, he is not an elite athlete by most standards, but is very good for this level of play. Additionally, Brazelton has good hands and collected a very impressive (for a forward) 1.10 steals per game. If Brazelton can extend his range and cut down on turnovers, he may be able to latch onto a minor league squad. He has the intangibles and decent enough athleticism to make his impact felt.

Finally, Sterling's Travis Minton deserves a mention. The 6'10 250 lb forward was efficient from the floor in his last season, connecting on 65.2% of his 23 field goal attempts. He must cut down on his weight, but he does have good potential if he can continue to improve on his overall game.

Kansas Wesleyan's Wes Jones is a 6'4 forward who graduated in 2010-2011, but he is an excellent athlete who jumps in the passing lanes and can take the ball coast to coast. He has an average handle, but is athletic at the rim and is vertically explosive enough to gather rebounds and contest shots on the other end. He gets close to the basket and finishes well inside. Jones does not shoot jumpers, which he must develop if he hopes to play at a higher level. But, he does have great quickness on his straight line drives to the hoop. Jones is a player with a lot of raw talent that has not been harnessed yet. If he can work on his game, he may be able to play in the minor leagues down the road.


(Image Sources: sgucavaliers.com, ccacsports.com, qctimes.com, marianstudentnewspaper.blogspot.com, crossroadsleague.com, mlive.com, and scwarriors.com)

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Memphis Grizzlies Draft 2012: The Case for Michael Kidd-Gilchrist

Before delving into my analysis, it must be noted that the Grizzlies only currently have the #25 pick in the draft. However, it is my sincere hope that they make the proper bid for a player that perfectly suits their organization.

The Grizzlies management and ownership has attempted to construct a team built on toughness, hustle, and grind-it-out defense. Michael Kidd-Gilchrist embodies all of these qualities. At St. Patrick's, MKG (as he is widely known these days) functioned as a second line of defense behind his squad's high octane guard lineup. He blocked shots and rebounded against some of the top players in the country night in and night out. And, his hustle and focus paid dividends, as his St. Patrick's team finished with a 26-1 record during his junior year. Also, who can forget that MKG was a huge part of Kentucky's NCAA Championship run.

After playing almost exclusively in the post at St. Patrick's, Michael Kidd-Gilchrist did an excellent job of transitioning to the wing during his only season of college basketball. While his handle is still a work in progress at this stage, he is able to weave to the basket and create opportunities for himself in halfcourt sets as well as on the fastbreak. Overall, he was fairly efficient from the field in his only season of college basketball. He posted an Offensive Rating of 111.4, good for 7th amongst players used on at least 20% of their team's possessions and 17th amongst all players in the conference. He got to the basket regularly and did an excellent job of finishing through contact. He finished with a True Shooting Percentage (a statistic which encompasses one's performance on free throw shooting as well as one's field goal attempts) of 57.0%, which was the 17th best in the SEC last year. When attacking the basket, Kidd-Gilchrist got to the line early and often, finishing with 192 Free throw attempts last season. His Free Throw Rate, which measures one's ability to get to the line relative to his total field goal attempts, was 58.9%, which was the 96th best nationally. As a point of comparison, an older Derrick Rose posted a 47.0% FT Rate in 2007. And while this differential can be explained away by the fact that MKG rarely took many outside jumpers, he does compare favorable to Rose drawing 4.6 fouls per 40 minutes compared to Rose's 5.3. Given the fact that MKG is criticized for his handle, this is a remarkable feat.

Aside from his penchant for attacking the basket, Michael Kidd-Gilchrist is a very good rebounding wing. While he averaged over 10 rebounds per game in high school against some of the top flight competition in the country, this figure should only supplement what he demonstrated at Kentucky. There he posted a Defensive Rebounding % of 16.1%, the third highest for a UK player and the 20th best in the SEC. He had the 17th best Offensive Rebounding % in the SEC at 10.2% as well. While this may not appear to be all that impressive from a cursory glance, one must consider the circumstances which he was playing under. MKG regularly defended the opposition's toughest guards and was forced to get back out with his transition defense. His motor was constantly running, yet he managed to post some of the better rebounding percentages in his conference (relative to height) given the fact that he played alongside star rebounders Anthony Davis and Terrence Jones. It is likely that this ability will translate at the next level and he will be a very good rebounding three. With regard to the Grizzlies, he would likely be able to complement Randolph and Marc Gasol when they step out for perimeter jumpers.

In terms of his shooting stroke, Michael Kidd-Gilchrist's slingshot motion can definitely use some work at the next level. While he generally keeps a straight arm on his shot, he tends to move his arms from left to right on his shooting motion. This makes it more difficult for him to square his body when shooting, as he is adjusting his arm motion to be in his field of vision. When he does finally line the ball up, he is already at the bottom of his jump, causing him to miss short at times. This description really accounts for the hitch in his shot, which will need to be corrected at the next level in order to improve the consistency on his long range jumper and extend his range. The further back he is forced to shoot, the more difficult a time he will have squaring his body given his shooting motion. His shooting stroke is certainly correctable, and with the help of a professional shooting coach, MKG will likely develop a serviceable jumper in the future.

MKG can also function as a post up player. While he did not receive as many possessions in the post during his time at Kentucky, MKG would be effective in Grizzlies sets as a post up wing player. Not only is he powerful on the block, but he is acrobatic at contorting his body and scoring past the outstretched arms of defenders. In his high school matchup with Joe Jackson's Memphis squad, MKG connected on the game winning basket after moving his arms and body to a nearly horizontal position. MKG also has good footwork in the post and a serviceable go-to jump hook shot, which he can get whenever he wants against NBA small forwards.

In terms of his passing ability, MKG is a sneaky passer who makes the right plays, but does not always look for the hockey assist. At Kentucky, he regularly kicked the ball out to open shooters and made some nifty passes inside to Anthony Davis when the opportunity presented itself. He is not quite a point forward, as his Assist Rate was only average (37th best in the SEC), but UK rarely ran the ball through his hands and thus did not really enable him to distribute the ball on a regular basis.

The defensive end is MKG's bread and butter. Not only does he possess very good lateral quickness, but he has the intelligence and court awareness to prevent easy baskets. Against Kansas in their Championship matchup, MKG was assigned with the responsibility of guarding high octane point guard Tyshawn Taylor. And, while Taylor was able to score against him in the 2nd half, MKG did a good job of contesting without fouling and limiting him in transition. On the season, MKG's 3.12 Fouls Committed Per 40 Minutes were high but reasonable for a player forced to guard the opposing team's best offensive option. Also, Kansas's Taylor had end to end speed of 5 seconds throughout the game and MKG was right there with him defensively. Another underrated aspect of Gilchrist's defensive game is his ability to lead his man into the shot blocker. On the season, he usually had good awareness of Anthony Davis's presence on the floor and usually led his offensive man right into Davis's outstretched hand. Further, Gilchrist studied player tendencies and forced them into uncomfortable shots, making them drive left when they are right handed, and vice versa. At this stage, it is likely that Gilchrist is versatile enough to at least play spot minutes guarding the 1-4 in the NBA. Statistically, he was effective but not remarkable with 1.3 steals and 1.2 blocks per 40 minutes.

In terms of the Memphis Grizzlies' needs, Gilchrist has the versatility to guard many positions in the NBA. This would allow him to be a part of many unique lineups. Further, his ability to attack the basket would further help the Grizzlies in their halfcourt sets, particularly when they go through long stretches where they are unable to get to the line. Additionally, MKG's ability to attack out in transition fits with Grizzlies personnel who want to get out and push the pace. Mike Conley is one of the quicker guards in the NBA, and he would enjoy playing alongside someone with the intensity and effort level of a MKG. Further, Gilchrist's work ethic is the best in the draft, and he will have a chance to become an allstar one day if he can improve on his paltry 3 point shooting (25.5%). Overall, MKG is a revelation at his age, and his transition to the guard position has been remarkable so far. In a couple of years, he could develop into the best player in this draft class if he puts the requisite time and effort in.


(Image Source: Yougodunkedon.com)

Saturday, June 16, 2012

Scouring the Nation (Part 12)


In this edition of Scouring the Nation, I examine players from NAIA Division II, USCAA Division I, and the USCAA Division II.

On a national level, the top players in NAIA Division II really tend to

fly under the radar at times. However, Northwood's player of the year, combo guard Jonathan Dunn has garnered national attention and ultimately received predraft workout opportunities with NBA teams. The 6'3 Dunn was the undisputed best player for the NAIA II's best team (until their finals loss at year's end). This unheralded guard has a decent first step and is able to get by his defender pretty regularly. When he does, he often makes tough floaters in the lane over the help defense. If he does not see a clear path to the basket, he often kicks the ball out or dishes inside to his teammates. With that said, Dunn must cut down on his turnovers if he hopes to play at a higher level of basketball overseas. His poor decision making at times, as evinced by his virtual 1 to 1 assist to turnover ratio, will limit his playing time at the next level regardless of his offensive prowess. With this weakness in mind, it must be noted that Dunn's greatest strength is his ability to move without the basketball. In the NAIA Division II National Championship game, he did a great job of running around multiple set screens and weaving in between them when he ended up with the ball in his hands. In this capacity, he is a very crafty player and will likely continue in such a role as a professional. Further, Dunn does a good job of drawing contact and getting to the line. He shot 80.4% on his 199 attempts on the year, which indicates that he gets there often and generally capitalizes on his opportunities. When he does not look to draw contact, Dunn possesses a nice fadeaway game and does a good job of creating space. He does a nice job of squaring his body in spite of how difficult a shot he may be taking. In terms of his offensive weaknesses, he tends to force the issue when things are not going his way. In the Championship Contest, he forced some ill-advised 3 point attempts to try to get himself going, but this ended up fueling Oregon Tech's transition game. Usually though, Dunn is a very good three point shooter, as he connected on 38.5% of his attempts. Defensively, Dunn has fairly good lateral quickness and can keep up with his opponents. However, the effort level that he puts forth on a regular basis really varies from game to game. In the NAIA II Finals, he did not always get low in his stance and he had trouble fighting through screens at times. With that said, he was fairly quick to the ball on closeouts, and did a good job as a part of his team's zone. Dunn will likely be a good defender at the next level, even though bigger shooting guards may shoot over the top of him. Overall, Dunn must continue to work on his poise and not force the action. He struggled against the zone, but part of it had to do with the fact that his teammates failed to move without the ball. Nonetheless, Dunn is a very good shooter and can score in a variety of ways. His decision making can use some work, but his ability to fill it up will likely remain the same at the next level.

Playing alongside Dunn in one of the NAIA DII's top backcourts, diminutive junior Tyrone Davis was one of the top players in the Championship contest. While he is one of the shortest players you will ever come across in basketball at 5'1, he plays with incredible heart and quickness. Davis really kept Northwood in the game and was really their only saving grace down the stretch. He consistently made look ahead passes, quick steals which turned into breakaway layups, and even rebounded the ball on the interior. Davis regularly found the open man in the championship matchup and made everyone on his team better. He fed big men in their halfcourt sets and kept everyone involved in the offense. On the year, he was one of the top passers in all of college basketball, averaging 7.94 assists per game while playing a secondary role to Northwood's star Dunn, who likes to have the ball in his hands. In the Championship matchup, Davis outquicked Oregon Tech's guards to the basket time and again. He made some pretty running flip shots off the glass with enough arc to avoid getting his shot blocked. He was able to dial in his own shot on pull up jumpers. While his shot was blocked on occasion when he took the ball all the way to the basket, he was able to score over 6'7 (and up) players by stopping on a dime, employing a believable ball fake, and eventually changing direction and scoring. He was also surprisingly effective on the glass and was able to secure a few rebounds on the inside after catching Oregon Tech's big men by surprise. Davis regularly hustles to loose balls and is gritty on the defensive end. He stole the ball on multiple occasions and was able to finish plays in transition. His quick hands enable him to be a weapon despite his size, much like Muggsy Bogues. But, much like Bogues, he will struggle at the next level in preventing players from either posting him up or shooting over the top of him. He will likely get caught in the air more often and probably will pick up more fouls as a result. Overall, Davis is one of the more interesting players that I have come across because of his interesting skillset and diminutive size.

Northwood's best big man, Masse Doumbe has a good chance to succeed as a professional basketball player. Not only does he have good size at 6'8, but he is a fluid enough athlete and can attack the basket off the dribble. Doumbe was efficient from the field, connecting on 49.7% of his field goal attempts. He displayed this ability on several occasions in halfcourt sets, but was also able to get out and score in transition on feeds from Davis. Doumbe does a nice job on the offensive glass and usually is able to put the ball back up and in. He averaged 6.8 rebounds per contest, and this number will likely improve next season as he continues to gain experience. It is concerning, though, that Doumbe does not gather more rebounds at this point. With that said, Doumbe also has solid potential due to his perimeter shooting stroke. He connected on 48.8% of his 82 three point attempts, which demonstrates that he will likely be able to keep defenses honest either from behind the arc or through a mid range jumper. Doumbe is also a good post passer and set Horstmann up for a couple of easy baskets inside. Defensively, Doumbe is able to block shots and steal the basketball, averaging 1.59 blocks and 1.59 steals per game. He is athletic enough to contest shots inside and prevented dribble penetration by Oregon Tech in the first half of Northwood's Championship contest. Overall, Doumbe will have another season to prove that he is an elite big man at the NAIA DII level with a developing skillset.

Fellow big man Patrick Horstmann also displayed several promising characteristics, and will be a part of next season's squad as well. Horstmann is predominantly a post player who does a nice job of cutting to the basket and getting open. He was able to move without the ball in the first half and really asserted himself on the block when he was given the ball. While he can use some work on his footwork, he does a good job employing a jump hook shot. Also, he is aggressive scoring off of offensive rebounds, and he is effective rebounding the basketball overall, leading his team with 8.3 rebounds per contest. Against Oregon Tech, he hustled to the ball and was able to give his team a couple of extra possessions as a result. While he does tend to get open, he must learn to finish plays through contact. On several possessions, he blew some opportunities to score inside. Further, he was unable to connect on a couple of open jumpers. But, on the year, he was effective scoring the ball from the field, hitting 54.4% of his shots. He also has decent range, hitting 44.2% of his 52 three point attempts.

On the opposing squad, freshman Bobby Hunter was probably the best player in NAIA DII by season's end. The freshman point guard led his team to a national championship victory and was an integral part of their tournament run. In the finals, he was savvy and looked to post up the smaller Davis. While he was largely shut down in the first half, he began to speed up the pace of the game and score in transition. In the second half, he made several nice spin moves moving towards the basket. He scored past help defenders by cutting to the basket. Hunter did an excellent job of moving without the ball and scored on several easy layups off of sharp basket cuts. On one possession, he even backed the ball out to catch the defender off guard and then attacked the basket, finishing through contact. Hunter was capable stepping out and hitting the outside jumper over bigger defenders. While he does need to improve his long range shooting, (34.7% 3pt %) Hunter was one of the best slashers outside of Division I this season. He is also incredibly strong for a freshman and is able to finish through contact inside, as evinced by his 51.6% FG%. Hunter is also a very good rebounding guard, averaging five rebounds per contest, and physically out muscling bigger players inside. Also, Hunter was a good decision maker, averaging 3.21 assists per contest, with a 1.39 to 1 assist to turnover ratio. In the championship matchup, Hunter found open perimeter shooters and set his team up for easy baskets when slashing to the rim. On the defensive end, Hunter is excellent, moving his feet well (with good lateral quickness) and employing considerable strength to force players off their path to the basket. In fact, Hunter is so strong that on one possession, he stood has ground against a Northwood post player and forced him to settle for a jumper when he was backing him down in the paint. Hunter does a nice job of getting his hands in the passing lanes and regularly takes the ball the other way for easy baskets. He also has the hands to pick the pockets of some of the best ball handlers. In this championship matchup, he stole the ball from Tyrone Davis on several occasions. On the year, he was one of the top players in the nation with 2.34 steals per contest. Overall, Hunter has great athleticism for a point guard and will likely be successful at whichever school accepts him as a transfer. Down the line, he may develop into an NBA draft prospect if he can continue to work on his shot.

6'3 senior guard Kyle Gomez had an excellent performance in the championship contest and really helped Oregon Tech win the NAIA DII title. Gomez was capable scoring off the dribble in this contest, and he demonstrated his ability to hit the floater, and he also connected on a running layup. Gomez came off screens as well and nailed a key three point basket to put the game out of reach for Northwood. On the year, Gomez shot a respectable 38.5% from behind the arc and 47.2% overall. Further, Gomez moved without the ball and scored on a nice cut to the basket. In terms of his ability to create for others, Gomez was an adequate system passer, and averaged 2.63 assists per contest. On the defensive end, Gomez does a nice job of hawking the basketball and virtually shut down Dunn due to his good lateral quickness and physical play on this end of the floor. In terms of his statistical production on this end, he averaged 1.95 steals per contest and utilized his good quickness and hands to disrupt the opposing team's best offensive option. Finally, due to his physicality on both ends of the floor, Gomez was a good rebounder, averaging 5.1 boards per contest.

Forward Scotty Riddle was another reason why Oregon Tech was able to outplay Northwood. His energy and efficient play on the interior really propelled Oregon Tech's offensive sets. Despite his advanced age at 32 years old, Riddle came in and played aggressive on both ends of the floor. He converted on a jumper in the lane and was able to get to the line on occasion as well. On the year, Riddle really picked his spots and shot 53.7% from the field, which was down from his 2010 average of 58.5%. Riddle is also a good decision maker on the offensive end, and he finished the season with a 1.63 to 1 assist to turnover ratio. With his strengths in mind, Riddle must improve on the glass, where he only secured 3.8 boards per contest. On the defensive end, Riddle was aggressive with his post defense. He also displayed decent lateral movement at times, and functions primarily as a positional defender. He also helped to slow down Davis on his drives to the basket. Overall, Scotty Riddle is a high energy role player that every team needs to succeed.

Forward Jason Gamblin is cut from the same cloth as Riddle. The older 6'6 forward does an effective job playing in the post. Not only did he shoot 56.1% FG% on the year, but he also connected on 52% of his 25 three point attempts. Gamblin employs a nice fadeaway jumper in the post, which he utilizes to score against bigger players. He can also stretch the defense with his jumper. Gamblin is an extremely physical post player and in the championship matchup with Northwood, he shielded himself from contact and made several strong post moves. Gamblin is a good rebounder, collecting 5.1 boards per game. Further, because he is aggressive driving to the basket, he tends to draw fouls. And, he shot 85.3% from the line on the year, displaying a nice shooting touch. In terms of his weaknesses, Gamblin fouled out of the championship contest and generally struggles with foul trouble, committing 2.79 fouls per contest. Further, he must cut down on his turnovers, as his 0.65 to 1 Assist to Turnover ratio is not going to cut it at a higher level of basketball.

Oregon Tech guard David Clarke was a great facilitator for his team and really helped lead his squad to a surprise victory. Clarke made all kinds of passes in this contest- hitting cutters, big men inside, and even looking ahead in transition for open opportunities. He was Oregon Tech's top assist man this past season with 4.24 assists per contest. His 2.64 to 1 Assist to turnover was one of the better marks for a point guard in the NAIA DII. Offensively, Clarke is crafty and scores off of offensive rebounding put backs. He also can step out and nail the deep 3 pt basket, as demonstrated by his second half shooting against Northwood. In actuality, Clarke was one of Oregon Tech's top weapons from deep on the year, connecting on 43.6% of his attempts. On the defensive end, Clarke plays the passing lanes very well, and tallied 1.82 steals per contest. He also has quick enough hands to pry the ball free from offensive players, and he stole the ball late in the second half on a Northwood rebound. Overall, David Clarke is a promising guard who will have an opportunity to prove himself with the rest of the Oregon Tech roster moving on next year.

Aside from the two squads in the NAIA Division II championship game, Indiana Tech and Indiana East's squads have players with considerable enough talent to land on a professional roster somewhere down the line. Indiana Tech's Rodney Bartholomew finished the season as a first team All-NAIA Division II player due to his tremendous presence on the glass. Bartholomew is a 6'8 230 lb forward with a nice post repertoire and the body control to finish through contact inside. He recognizes mismatches and regularly posts up smaller players when he receives the opportunity. He possesses a good drop step and decent enough footwork to make an impact at the professional level somewhere. Bartholomew is a very physical player on the block, and utilizes spin moves to roll off players' shoulders before he scores. He is extremely aggressive on the glass as well, particularly on the offensive end. At this level, he received at least three opportunities to complete plays because he was physical enough to seal his man and obtain positioning in the paint. He averaged 11.42 rebounds per game and was a dominant clean up player a season ago. At the next level, he must improve as a shooter though. He does not shoot the ball with a straight arm and therefore must improve his shooting motion at the next level because his current shooting form will limit his ability to extend his range. He occasionally employs a mid range jumper, which he can make at times. But, he is at his best attacking the basket. Bartholomew was one of the most dominant forces at any level of play in terms of drawing contact, drawing 261 free throw opportunities, and connecting on a decent 68.2% of his attempts. On the defensive end, Bartholomew does a good job of contesting without fouling, but is not much of a shot blocker. He likes to front the post and deflect the basketball. Overall, if Bartholomew can improve his shooting form and continue to display his same level of aggressiveness on the glass, he should be able to secure a sizable contract overseas.



Playing alongside Bartholomew in the paint was 6'8 270 lb transfer Chris Ware. Ware is very much a complimentary player to Bartholomew. While Bartholomew relies on his athleticism and sheer aggression to score inside, Ware has a more refined game. Despite his size, Ware possesses a soft touch on his shot and is capable of connecting from the mid range. On his back to the basket post moves, Ware is not as nimble as Bartholomew, but he does implement a nice jump hook shot where he works to shield the ball with his body. He connected on several running jump hook shots in his game with Indiana East, and even hit the game winner. Ware has a high basketball IQ and is able to score off of in bounds plays. Further, Ware is an excellent passer for his position. He is capable of making backdoor passes to cutting wings or lobbing it inside to Bartholomew for easy buckets. On the defensive end, Ware is a smart defender who relies on good positioning. He made several great contests against Indiana East and was able to move big men from their spots. He also has good hands and is able to deflect the ball from smaller players. With that said, he needs to shed weight in order to obtain favorable lateral mobility. This will allow him to draw charges at the next level and cut down on the number of fouls that he picks up. Overall, Chris Ware is an intelligent basketball player who needs to get into better game shape and learn to become a more aggressive post player. At this stage, he has the potential to improve considerably if he puts the requisite time in.

Indiana Tech's wings also stood out and have a chance to prove themselves even more next season. Junior wing Jordan Hickman was a standout JUCO player who has made an impact so far at Indiana Tech. Hickman displays good form on his jumper, but must shoot the ball consistently, without fading away. He got into a shooting funk this season (38.6% FG% and 34.7% 3 pt %) and thus struggled with his jumper at times in spite of his decent form. Hickman has the potential to become a high volume scorer at this level and beyond. He moves well without the ball and is a willing passer. He regularly hits open three point shooters when slashing to the basket, and he also is willing to feed big men when on the wing. Hickman is a fairly good athlete with a quick first step. He is aggressive on the offensive glass, and has a nice floater in his arsenal when attacking the basket. Overall, Hickman is a good rebounding guard (3.60 per game playing alongside Bartholomew) and his numbers should improve with the losses of Indiana Tech's two post players. On the defensive end, Hickman is probably Indiana Tech's best option. He was able to limit First Team All NAIA DII Marcus Isaac at times, and has good lateral quickness. He also has good ball denial defense, preventing the opposition from feeding the ball to their best scorer. There is a chance that Hickman may play some point guard next season. He is more of a fundamental passer, but if he can develop this aspect of his game, he will be even more valuable. He was fairly reliable with the ball in his hands last season, posting a 2.56 to 1 assist to turnover ratio. Overall, next season will be Hickman's last chance to prove that he can thrive on both ends of the floor. He will have a chance to lead as Indiana Tech's top scoring option and facilitator, and will likely remain their top defender. If he can shoot efficiently and continue to show effort on defense, he has a chance to land somewhere after next season.

Additionally, 6'5 wing Melvin Brooks should also be a standout next season for Indiana Tech. The junior is a good scoring wing who does a decent job finishing off of basket cuts and clean up baskets. He did not shoot the ball efficiently last season, connecting on 28.6% of his 3pt attempts and 41.1% from the field overall. He must be more aggressive in demanding the ball though, as he is a good enough athlete to score inside against NAIA DII competition. Brooks is a capable rebounder off of weakside baskets and does a nice job of drawing fouls. In the contests I watched, he was able to finish through contact off of offensive rebounds and draw fouls on 3 point attempts. Brooks will likely receive more opportunities at the line next season as a focal point of Indiana Tech's offense. When he gets there, though, he must improve on the paltry 57.7% that he shot at the charity stripe last season. On defense, Brooks is effective at guarding bigger players in the post, but was not matched up with many wing options. His closeouts were effective, but he must continue to work in this area. Overall, Melvin Brooks is a good athlete with a developing game. If he can improve his shooting motion and continue to put in work on the defensive end as well, he could be one of the biggest surprises next season.


For Indiana East, NAIA II First Team All American Marcus Isaac has a chance to be the top player in NAIA Division II next season. He is a wiry 6'1 combo guard with the floor game to receive playing time professionally. Isaac was one of the most efficient shooters at any level of play last season. He rarely takes bad outside shots, and regularly connects from his spot in the corner. He shot a blistering 46.7% from 3 point range on 210 attempts. He also hit 89.4% of his free throw attempts. Isaac does a nice job of coming off of picks and usually has his feet set before he shoots. In his contest with Indiana Tech, Isaac displayed excellent quickness getting to the basket and finishing ahead of the pack in transition. He went coast to coast on one play off of a rebound. Additionally, he showed that he can attack the basket in Indiana East's halfcourt sets. He drove past his man and finished with an athletic up and under play on one possession. On another, he utilized his superior length to score over his man. In terms of his handle, Isaac has very long arms, but is able to control the basketball and push it at times. He can function as a floor general at times, although his assist to turnover ratio was just below 1.0. Isaac must become a more proficient passer next season in order to quell some fears that he won't be able to play either guard spot. On the defensive end, Isaac has the length to get in the passing lanes and disrupt. He did a very good job of bothering Hickman and was one of the top ball thiefs on his team, averaging 1.69 steals per contest. He also utilized his length and athleticism to average 0.78 blocks per game. All in all, Isaac will likely be able to translate at the next level due to his tremendous shooting ability and length. He should only continue to eschew concerns regarding his height by becoming more of a distributor next season, yet still relying on his sweet shooting stroke.

Several other teammates were notable for Indiana East. In particular, Matt Trimnell was fairly impressive in the contests that I watched. Despite not finding his long range stroke against Indiana Tech, Trimnell is a good shooter who made 39.9% of his attempts. While Indiana Tech's big men prevented him from scoring inside at times, he was able to make several impressive lay ins moving towards the basket. Trimnell was effective getting to the line against Indiana Tech, and he capitalized on most of these attempts. (shot 81.1% from the FT line) Aside from attacking the basket, Trimnell is aggressive inside on the glass, and he hit a momentum shifting basket late in the game after following up on his own miss. He averaged 4.87 rebounds per contest last season and was aggressive against players much bigger than him. Trimnell is also a good passer, and he averaged 3.0 assists and 2.13 turnovers per game. On the defensive end, Trimnell was aggressive and did a nice job disrupting Indiana Tech's offense. He has quick hands, as evinced by his 1.87 steals per contest. Overall, Trimnell plays much bigger than his 6'3 listed height and has some potential to really stand out alongside Isaac next season.

Aside from the All Americans, Indiana East's Terry Weathers also had a noteworthy senior season. Despite his subpar percentages on the season (37.2% FG%), Weathers possesses some solid offensive tools when the ball is in his hands. Against Indiana Tech, he displayed his ability to connect from distance. He also was physical driving to the basket, and finished through contact on several occasions. Weathers possesses solid quickness on both ends of the floor, and he was able to get his own rebound at times against a tough Indiana Tech frontline. Further, Weathers brought experience and decision making to his squad this year, finishing with 2.33 assists per game and only 1.60 turnovers per contest. Weathers did not have the ball in his hands enough to be super effective, playing alongside one of the top backcourts in NAIA Division II. He may have a chance to play minor league basketball in the US and provide a spark off the bench.

Senior David Sanders also made his mark for Indiana East. He did a great job of distributing the ball to open teammates and really spurred their comeback against Indiana Tech. On the year, Sanders averaged 5.41 assists and only 1.78 turnovers per contest. Offensively, Sanders finished on several tough floaters, one with his left hand, and was able to tie the game with 30 seconds left in the 1st half. Sanders also went coast to coast in this contest, finishing on a layup in transition. In his team's halfcourt sets, Sanders was just as effective, driving to the basket with ease and nearly finishing on an in bounds lob. On the year, Sanders shot 49.6% from the field and 35.6% from behind the 3 point line, fairly average statistics for a player with his ability to get to the basket. But, Sanders really created for his teammates and was one of the more valuable passers at this level of play. His 3.0 to 1 assist to turnover ratio is excellent for anyone, and should allow him to play in the minor leagues somewhere.


Vermont Tech's Kevin Carr was the leading scorer this past season in USCAA Division II. He is a 6'2 combo guard with the ability to stretch the defense and create shots for his teammates. He displays a decent release point on his shot, even though he does not move without the ball much. At the next level, he will be asked to come off of screens in order to free himself for open jumpers. He has the range to achieve success at the next level. Carr shot 43.0% from 3 point range, but connected on only 43.7% of his field goal attempts. While he has a serviceable shooting form, Carr's shot selection sometimes left a lot to be desired mainly because he was the only person on his Vermont Tech team that could create his own offense. Carr is an excellent passer, who can feed lob entry passes into big men, utilize the bounce when necessary, and hit open three point shooters after employing shot fakes. Carr was the only player at this level who likely would have made a difference in the NAIA and probably stood out. As a result, he likely will play professionally at some point.

Additionally, USCAA Division 2 standouts Jovan Brown and Chris Dickinson made a name for themselves last season for PSU-Dubois. Dickinson was the 5th leading scorer in USCAA DII. He primarily functions as a slasher and inside player despite being listed at 6'4. He is capable of getting inside and finishing. In the contests that I witnessed, he made a few nice moves to the rim, including a nifty spin move up and in. He is also capable of playing as a back to the basket player, posting up against smaller guards and eventually drawing contact. He implements fundamental pump fakes and regularly gets defenders in the air. On several occasions, he was able to draw two defenders with a great pump fake, but he utilized good body control to get around them for a basket. With that said, he must work on elevating to the rim, as he has a tendency of getting his shot blocked if defenders do not bite on the initial shot fake. Further, Dickinson is a capable passer and was able to feed his team's big man by throwing it to his outstretched hand and evading the post defender's attempt at overplaying the ball. As a result of his fundamental play, Dickinson shot 56.3% from the field. Further, because he spends a lot of time in the paint, he was able to secure 7.35 rebounds per game last season. He has good instincts on the glass and does a good job of boxing out on both ends. On the defensive end, Dickinson must learn to defend faster guards, even though he occasionally displayed good hands and was able to turn steals into transition opportunities.

His teammate Jovan Brown is a similar player, but relies heavily on his quickness, rather than his basketball savvy. Brown is an aggressive defender who averaged 1.90 steals per game last season. He has good lateral quickness and has quick hands to knock the ball away. Brown is one of the best at deflecting the ball. He does not always play passing lanes and tends to focus on his offensive assignment. He is particularly effective in preventing penetration from beyond the three point line. On the offensive end, Brown is a 6'1 combo guard who is a capable passer and scorer. In the contests that I watched, he made several "heads-up" passes inside. Also, he relies on his slashing ability to attack the basket. Brown has a very quick first step and is able to get by defenders at this level with ease. Once he blows by his man, he does a good job of finishing at the rim, as evinced by his 56.9% FG%. Aside from attacking the hoop, Brown also creates opportunities for his teammates. He had good chemistry finding Dickinson slashing to the hoop last season. Additionally, he would hit open three point shooters once defenses converged on him. Despite these notable strengths, Brown does tend to play out of control at times, picking up offensive fouls and losing the ball on plays where his concentration just isn't there. Occasionally, he bobbles the ball out of bounds, or simply has his pass taken away. He must continue to work on his lead guard abilities, as well as develop a consistent jumper in order to be effective at the next level.

Moreover, Southern Maine's Josh Mackie stood out as a three point shooter last season. He connected on 42.4% of his three point attempts, but shot just 41.4% from the field overall. Mackie must work on developing a more reliable jumper and continue to condition himself and improve his ball speed. At this point, he is also a serviceable passer with 4.21 assists per game, but the 6'1 Mackie is going to have to become a full time point guard at the next level.

Maine-Machias' Zach Armstrong shot a worse percentage from three point range than Mackie (39.9%), but was more capable from inside the arc, hitting 46.9% of his FG attempts. Armstrong, much like Mackie, must learn to get to the line more frequently, as he shot a respectable 70.4% there on only 108 attempts this past season. Armstrong was also a capable rebounding presence, with 4.66 boards per game.

Despite playing only part of the season, Armstrong's teammate Jeremy Tolbert shared in these similar criticisms, as he got to the line 77 times in his 24 games played. Tolbert is a deadeye three point threat who connected on 41.7% of his attempts and shot it from long range more frequently than his teammate Zach Armstrong. Tolbert has a reliable stroke and finished shooting 44.7% from the floor overall and 79.2% from the line. Tolbert did a nice job of distributing the ball to his teammates, as he averaged 2.29 assists per game. On the defensive end, Tolbert was a threat, collecting 1.75 steals per contest.

Some USCAA DII underclassmen also displayed considerable talent this past season. Valor Christian sophomore Alan Jones had a spectacular season on both ends of the floor and likely has the most potential of any player at this level. Jones is an excellent defender who possesses great lateral quickness. He pressures the ball very well and this usually requires offensive players to ask for a ball screen. He needs to improve in getting around and recovering from these picks, but he generally does an excellent job on the defensive end. He was statistically productive enough to average 2.11 steals per game. On the offensive end, Jones was remarkable efficient in his second season of college basketball. He averaged 20.1 points per game, shot 58.7% from the field and 80.8% from the line. Further, he is a solid athlete and was able to collect 7.89 rebounds per game (including 4.63 rebounds on the offensive glass) despite his short stature. At 6'2, Jones must become more of a facilitator and look to extend his range if he hopes to play at the next level. He averaged 4.05 assists per game this season, but must continue to cut down on turnovers and learn to fill the role of a lead guard.

Further, Warren Wilson College's sophomore big man Rashad Ali also was noteworthy in his performances this season. The 6'6 185 lb sophomore forward has a long way to go in his physical development, but was one of the more efficient players in the USCAA DII all season long. He averaged 14.5 points per contest on 61.3% shooting from the field. He must improve on the glass, where he only averaged 6.40 rebounds per contest, but these numbers should improve with his physical development. On the defensive end, Ali must bulk up in order to bang with the bigger stretch forwards. He does show good potential, blocking 1.80 shots per contest. Overall, Ali must continue to develop his jump shooting and look to add more weight so that he can be more physical in the post. Looking forward, Ali must look to develop his basketball IQ and eventually become a clean up role player.

At the USCAA DI level, Lindenwood University-Belleville's top standout is junior guard Todd Starks. The former Idaho St. transfer possesses solid tools and will likely play at some professional level when he graduates. At 6'1, Starks is a combo guard with a below average handle and solid length to adapt at a higher level of play. Starks' main strength is his outside stroke. He can connect from deep off the catch or off the dribble, and he likes to shoot over the top of smaller defenders. At this level, Starks handles the ball as a point guard would, but he has the scoring ability to take over contests. Against Indiana Tech, Starks nailed several deep jumpers from well beyond NBA range. Starks has a fairly quick release and does a good job of coming off of picks to free himself. He also is capable at the free throw line, where he connected on 84.5% of his attempts. Further, Starks is a capable passer who averaged 3.74 assists per contest last season. He needs to cut down on his turnovers- in the contest that I watched, he was called for several carries and this put his team in a difficult position. Starks is fairly quick with the ball in his hands and can attack the basket. On the defensive end, Starks has the length to cause problems and has the quick hands to disrupt ball handlers. All in all, Starks is one of the top players at the USCAA DI level, and he should continue to develop his handle next season, as he has a shot to catch the eye of some international scouts with his sweet shooting touch.

Starks's teammate LaQuan Pierce was a high energy senior that really played well in the contests that I witnessed. Pierce is an excellent athlete and the type of role player that every team needs. Despite his height at 6'5, Pierce plays strictly inside, and is a strong fadeaway jump shooter. He nailed several of these difficult shots against Indiana Tech. He does a nice job of squaring his body to the basket. However, on some occasions, Pierce tended to fade away unnecessarily and this threw off his shot. If he can go straight up against defenders most of the time, this should help him improve on his 46.0% from the floor. When he does fadeaway, he does a nice job of drawing contact and was capable of getting to the line all season long. He must improve on his 68.4% shooting there though. On the defensive end, Pierce provides great energy and was able to make some extremely difficult blocks, utilizing his effortless leaping ability to prevent easy slashing opportunities. It is likely that Pierce could play in a minor league in the US other than the PBL or D League if he really works at his game.

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Scouring the Nation (Part 11)

In this edition of Scouring the Nation, I examine some of the players who stood out at season's end in Division III. Featured are original scouting reports on Noel Hollingsworth, Cory Lemons, John Boyd, Aaron Walton-Moss, Jordan Zimmer, Chris Davis, Ray Askew, James Wang, Lamonte Thomas, and Javon Williams.

The first prospect of note who really performed well in the Division III semifinals and throughout the tournament is Noel Hollingsworth. This 6'9 big man had an exceptional season after returning from back and knee injuries the season before. Clearly, he does not have the same quickness that he may have had, but it is likely that he would always have limitations in this regard. Noel is an exceptionally intelligent player on both ends of the floor who utilizes his physical tools to the best of his ability. In his contest against eventual champions Wisconsin Whitewater, Hollingsworth demonstrated his post fundamentals and was able to score regularly against POY Chris Davis. Noel displayed his virtually unguardable right and left hook shots, which he got off immediately after receiving a post entry feed. Noel was also physically imposing on box outs, muscling his way down low and securing rebounds when he could.


Additionally, Hollingsworth was able to use his body to create space with his defender before releasing an open shot. On most of his power post moves, he was able to physically out-maneuver the opponent even when they leaned heavily on him and could have easily been called for fouls. He usually attacked their body either backing into them or spinning around them off the dribble. Additionally, Noel understands when to go to his post repertoire and when to kick the ball back out, as he did this on several occasions after facing double teams. After this happened, he either was open on a re-post or set his teammate up for an open perimeter jumper. In terms of his shooting prowess, Hollingsworth demonstrated good fundamentals on his shot, but was unable to connect from deep against Whitewater. However, on the season, he experienced some success shooting from behind the arc, connecting on 41.8% of his 3 point attempts. While he does have good passing instincts, Noel can be slow getting into his post moves and this leads to turnovers when he is double teamed.

On the defensive end, Noel will be a liability due to his lack of lateral quickness and the fact that he does not jump very often on either end of the floor. At the Division III level, he was able to collect 1.7 blocks per game, despite his average/below average leaping ability. This will not continue at the next level. However, in this contest, Hollingsworth mostly looked to position himself for charges and was able to do a good job of contesting without fouling. He was able to draw offensive fouls and used his body well to move into position. Further, Hollingsworth bodies up in the post and tries to weed his man out of the paint. He also has good awareness and is able to deflect poor passes to his teammates, who- in turn- are able to turn those turnovers into transition opportunities. With this said, his lack of quickness hurts him on the glass where he only gathered 6.8 rebounds per game (4.4 drpg) despite his height advantage. He is able to box out and get to balls, but is not athletic enough to sky for rebounds from the weakside etc. Thus, he is very much a position rebounder, and is not useful at all in this respect when stepping out to attempt perimeter jumpers.

Overall, Noel Hollingsworth is an intelligent offensive player with the physicality and sheer determination to play somewhere overseas next year if he so desires. His injuries definitely impacted his play, but he was able to go right at some of the top post players in all of Division III, getting the better of Chris Davis at times and putting together a dominant effort against AJ Matthews, the best big man prospect outside of D1. In that contest, he put up a 37 point and 12 rebound effort against Farmingdale St., while getting Matthews into foul trouble. (He was held to 11 points and 5 rebounds) His team ended up winning by 20 points and advancing to the next round. If Hollingsworth decides to continue with basketball after this season, he should be able to field some offers, but must cut down on the turnovers and work to improve on his quickness in order to have success against bigger, more athletic players.

In the other semifinal matchup, Cabrini College's Cory Lemons was the most valuable player on his team all season long and led his squad to a 31-2 record on the year, advancing to the Division III final and just barely being ousted by Wisconsin Whitewater. This 5'10 point guard is capable of beating opponents in many different ways. First, it should be noted that his greatest strength is his ability to attack off the bounce. Of all the players that I have scouted in Division III, Lemons appears to have the quickest first step. He is a blur driving by his man and is able to use his first step to create better shots for himself.

Because of his elite speed, Lemons was able to beat his opponents down the floor in his last two contests. He drove to the basket with some regularity and was able to draw fouls. However, against top Division III competition, Lemons was unable to close the gap because Cabrini's opponents would often clog the paint. As such, Lemons did a nice job swinging the ball from side to side so that one of his teammates could create off the bounce.

Lemons has excellent court vision and is more than willing to function in this role when his shot is not falling. In their semifinal matchup with Illinois Wesleyan, Lemons struggled with his shot, but was able to dish the ball to his teammates in a variety of ways. He was able to push the ball in transition to open teammates, and was even able to split defenders and dish to cutting teammates. He is most effective driving all the way to the basket and feeding either a cutting guard or a post man streaking to the basket. As mentioned before though, he is more than willing to kick it out to open three point shooters. He did this early and often and this helped John Boyd get on track for his career night. He understands where to feed his teammates and thus is able to secure excellent looks for them.

In terms of his perimeter shooting, Lemons is dynamic off the bounce. He is able to get into a jump shooting motion very quickly off the dribble and with a great deal of accuracy. He shot 41.7% from three point range despite being the focal point of most team's defesnive schemes. His jumper inside of three point range is probably even more accurate for him, and he goes to it with regularity. Lemons can turn the ball over at times, and must learn to not jump in the air to make a pass. But, he is also a tremendous rebounder for his size, securing 6.2 boards per game on the year.

On the defensive end, Lemons is exceptionally quick and is able to pick up steals by using his solid hands. He does not foul often, though, so he normally plays good position defense. His lateral quickness allows him to stay with just about anyone, and he was tenacious on switching plays when he was forced to defend the post.

Overall, Cory Lemons is one of the more complete guards in Division III basketball, and it is no wonder that he was the catalyst behind a program defining season.

Teammate John Boyd also had a tremendous showing in his final two contests. In the semifinal, Boyd buried three pointers almost effortlessly, with a hand in his face fading away from the basket. While he did not shoot the ball exceptionally well on the year (33% 3 point %), he was extremely effective in these games. He was capable spotting up off the dribble or nailing long range shots off the catch. His mid range game also appears to be fairly advanced despite his subpar numbers on the year. (approximately 38%) Boyd's range extends well beyond NBA threes and he effortlessly hit these shots after squaring up. He had a career high in points and three pointers made in the semifinal, but was able to score in a variety of other ways as well. Boyd was also very clutch in his final game, connecting on an incredibly difficult 'and 1' attempt fading away with 44 seconds to go. He then knocked down his free throw to keep Cabrini in the game late.

Boyd put in a solid effort on the defensive end against Jordan Zimmer in the semifinal and was able to deflect several passes and turn them into transition baskets. He can run the fast break and has a decent enough handle and instincts to know when to give the ball up. He gets low in his defensive stance and plays physically enough that he is able to deter perimeter jump shooters from releasing their shot. In halfcourt sets, he was also able to attack the basket and get to the line with ease. There he shot 76.5% on the year and was able to earn himself enough attempts at the charity stripe to make a difference for his team. He was able to do this because he is quick enough to get by his man, but also utilizes his shot fake well and this opens up opportunities for him. Boyd does need to avoid putting his head down and charging to the basket, as he was called for offensive fouls on several occasions. All in all, John Boyd is a supporting player that may be able to play in the Americas if he can continue to shoot the ball efficiently, as he did late in the season.

Cabrini College's star freshman Aaron Walton-Moss also made an impact on both ends of the floor and was a big reason why his team made it to the Division III tournament final. While he was forced to play as a forward due to his physical nature, he does have the handles at 6'1 to be an effective lead guard if given the opportunity. He dribbles under control and can break away in transition, as he demonstrated on numerous breakaway steals. He is extremely physical and has the footspeed to defend the post or the wing positions. Further, his quickness and physical nature allow him to create space in the lane and score past his defender. Walton-Moss shot an efficient 57.8% from the floor this past season. He has good athleticism and was able to jump up to block some shots of players up to 6 inches taller than him. His athleticism also helped him on the glass last year, where he was able to gather 8.6 rebounds per game in spite of his height. While he does have a lot of promise and will likely be given a bigger role in the offense next year with Lemons' absence, Walton-Moss does need to improve his jump shot, as he does not always shoot with a straight arm and sometimes has a bit of a hitch in his shot. Walton-Moss is a player to keep an eye on in the future, as he already was a main contributor on one of the best teams in the country as a freshman.

On the opposing squad in the semifinals, guard Jordan Zimmer had an excellent showing against Cabrini. The 6'5 Illinois Wesleyan standout has the size and skillset to obtain success at a high level abroad. Zimmer is a prototypical wing who only needs a moment of daylight to get his shot off. While Cabrini's John Boyd had the game of his life, Zimmer matched Boyd's effort at times, connecting from long range and keeping his team in the game. He has a picture perfect stroke with good elevation and does not vary in his form. On several occasions, he hit shots from long range despite being fouled.  He was effective in transition and was able to pull up then or kick it to an open teammate. Zimmer utilizes screens well, rubbing off and allowing himself to break free for open jumpers. Zimmer is also capable going to the basket, and demonstrated this at times when he was able to beat his man off the dribble. While he does not possess a particularly quick first step, Zimmer makes up for this with the threat of his outside shot and his overall basketball savvy.

In the semifinal against Cabrini, Zimmer made some beautiful skip passes to set his teammates up for shots. He did a nice job of feeding the post, giving it to his teammate on the correct hand and setting him up for a layup. Further, Zimmer played a physical brand of basketball. He boxed out and secured loose rebounds, doing whatever it took to win. He was very aggressive and was willing to bang with the frontcourt players. Defensively, Zimmer displayed some good potential. While he did give up some points to John Boyd, he played hard nosed defense, digging into him and contesting jump shots without fouling. He made several steals in the game due to his quick hands, and he possessed decent enough lateral quickness to disrupt straight line drives. Overall, Zimmer is one of the more promising prospects that I have seen in DIII, and he almost certainly will have an opportunity to play somewhere next year.

The Division III player of the year also deserves a mention due to his solid play throughout the tournament. Wisconsin Whitewater's Chris Davis was one of the most physically imposing players in all of Division III. Standing at roughly 6'6 and weighing roughly (guestimate) 240 pounds, Davis is capable of forcing his will in the paint. In his semifinal matchup, he did a good job of outmuscling Hollingsworth at times when he looked to score inside. He was able to seal his man whenever he received deep post position. And, he is mobile enough to score off of spin moves, shifting his weight to either shoulder. Davis has decent footwork and a nice jump hook, which he gets off by pinning his man with his shoulders. At the next level, he will not be able to assert himself in this manner because he will face players with comparable size and greater height and athleticism. Davis is an exceptional passer out of the post and he regularly set his teammates up for open outside buckets. He can also handle the ball and pass when attacking the basket, but these situations arise less frequently.

Further, Davis is capable of getting in the lane with his deceptive quickness. He can hit runners and is willing to pull up if he can create enough space. At the next level, he will find it much more difficult to get his shot off in the paint because he lacks ideal size for a post player. However, he is also an excellent long range shooter. He has a consistent stroke from outside and is able to connect with some proficiency, hitting 41.1% of his attempts. While he does have a quick enough release to get his shot off at the next level, his shot will run the risk of being blocked because he has virtually no lift from outside. As a result, he is going to have to take deeper shots and mix it up more often. He is fairly dynamic shooting the ball and can hit from virtually anywhere. In this way, he is somewhat reminiscent of a less physically fit version of Jae Crowder.

Defensively is where Davis has the most room to grow. He is very physical in the post and adequately weeds his man out. Further, he has very good hands and is able to deflect the ball away from his opposition. He can anticipate passes and could become more of a weapon if he is able to shed some weight. This became a concern in both the semifinals and the championship game. He was forced to sub out for key stretches in both contests because he was too winded to play at his best. This has to change if he is going to take on basketball as a profession. He must drop about 30 pounds to be in optimal shape. While his play was a pivotal part of Whitewater's late run against Cabrini in the championship, one has to imagine that if Davis played more consistent minutes, he would have   been able to assert himself earlier and his team would not have been forced to come back. Overall, Davis is an intriguing prospect with some excellent intangibles, but must drop some weight in order to be effective at the next level.


Ray Askew is one of the best athletes that I have reviewed at the D3 level. The Albertus Magnus standout had one of his better showings against Johnson & Wales, which features DIII's top player. He was a dominant paint presence at 6'7 and was able to leap with the best of them. He began by winning the tip and continued to assert himself on the glass. Askew employs his great length and leaping ability to simply come out of no where and grab boards at times. He has decent box out fundamentals, but is best at jumping in from the weakside and snatching the ball in midair. He finished the contest against Johnson & Wales by grabbing a rebound and holding out the clock. It is clear that he is one of the best rebounders at the D3 level with 9.7 boards per game, and it is probable that his ability on this end will translate even if he converts to the small forward position.


Aside from his tenacity on the glass, Askew has the ball skills and potential from beyond the arc to become a small forward long term. On several occasions, he dribbled the ball in transition and was able to get to the basket. He is an effective player off the dribble, breaking down his man and keeping him off balance. Askew has a decent handle, but must work on his change of pace and direction dribbles to really throw his defender off guard. At this point, he is serviceable with his straight line dribble and is able to blow by his defender or stop on a dime for a pull up jumper. With that said, Askew must cut down on his turnovers and work on distributing to his teammates. At this point, he often loses the ball because he is double teamed on a regular basis. He needs to have better court awareness, as his 0.4 assist to turnover ratio is not good enough to earn minutes at any level of play.


With that said, Askew is a very talented offensive weapon. He can step out and hit the three, as evinced by his 43.8% shooting percentage from beyond the arc on limited attempts. Or, he can beat his defender off the bounce. But, because of his elite athleticism, Askew is best at attacking his defender and getting to the line. He averaged 11.5 free throw attempts per game, but must work on his 67.0% from the charity stripe. Askew does a nice job of anticipating contact and jumping into his man, particularly when moving to the basket. He is capable of getting his defender in the air and finishing through contact. In his contest with Johnson & Wales, he converted on several double pump moves going to the hoop and was able to score through fouls at times.


On the defensive end, Askew was very impressive as an enforcer in the paint. Given his solid leaping ability and fluid athleticism, Askew was able to block several shots in the lane. Further, he has the hands to steal the ball away and was great with his defensive pressure. On the season, he averaged 1.5 steals per game and deflected even more balls. But, despite his decent statistical defensive numbers, Askew is best as a positional defender. He often bodies up players in the paint without fouling. In his contest with Johnson & Wales, he forced countless bad shots and was physical, but avoided fouling due to his good foot speed and positioning. He drew several charge calls (one on Lamonte Thomas) and was able to impact the game in a variety of ways. Overall, Askew is a player that can achieve success at the next level. He has the physical profile and developing skillset to stick with a team if he can learn to limit his turnovers.


Additionally, Williams' James Wang played on some winning squads during his four years with the team, and he was a critical reason why. This serviceable point guard is a willing passer despite his meager 2.0 assists per game. He is willing to distribute the ball around the perimeter and usually looks to make the extra pass, which does not always convert immediately into open shot opportunities. As such, he usually makes the first pass in a series. Wang is a willing passer, but is more effective offensively when he is connecting from beyond the arc. On the season, Wang had a rather poor shooting percentage (for his standards- 33.3%), but was able to hit long range shots at critical junctures. Further, while he did shoot a fairly low percentage on the year, he fell into a shooting slump late in the season. While he is exceptionally quick off the dribble, he did not get to the line all that often, with only 74 attempts on the year. Although he did hit 82.4% of those attempts, he should have been more effective at drawing contact. One key issue regarding why his statistics were down this season centers around the fact that he did not always touch the ball on the offensive end. On some plays, he would not be a featured part of the offense and instead had to innovate when teams did not converge on him immediately.


With that said, he is a fundamentally sound basketball player. Wang is a capable rebounder despite his size, as he does a good job of boxing out. He also has a very good handle and does a decent job of controlling tempo. Further, he makes decent post entry passes, and effectively rubs off on screens. On the defensive end, Wang possesses great awareness. Not only does he have exceptional lateral quickness, but his IQ is fairly advanced for a player at the DIII level. Wang plays good positional defense with his feet and his good hands enable him to collect steals. Further, Wang often forces other players into turnovers, either by making them lose their balance and causing them to travel, or by drawing charges. He has the ability to move laterally and to get into position to get hit and draw the offensive foul, as he prides himself on his ability to force turnovers. Overall, Wang must continue to improve his three point shooting and work to become more efficient from long range. He must also look to assert himself more on the offensive end, as he appears to have a fairly high basketball IQ.


While Wang tries to play within his team's offense, Lamonte Thomas is the most valuable player in his team's sets. In addition to what I have mentioned in previous reviews, it is clear that Lamonte has the potential to succeed at the next level. He got to the line approximately 11 times per game this past season. Additionally, while he does have somewhat of a hitch in his shooting motion (which can be corrected), Thomas is consistent and is able to release his shot quickly and with a fairly consistent form when he is on balance. In his matchup with Askew and Albertus Magnus, Thomas was able to deflect balls and show some more wrinkles to his game on the defensive end. He has decent lateral quickness, but occasionally struggles to fight through screens, something that he will have to improve on. Further, he is capable of stealing the ball, but tends to play positional defense. With that said, it is clear that he will not have the ball in his hands offensively as often as he did at Johnson & Wales. As such, his turnovers will likely be cut down significantly and he probably will have more energy to expend on defense.


In terms of his ability to run the team, Thomas almost single handedly kept his team in the game against Albertus Magnus before fouling out. He distributed the ball to his teammates, and executed several difficult fadeaway shots off of the correct pivot foot. Thomas does an excellent job of initiating contact and finishing, as I have mentioned before. Further, Thomas looks to push the tempo on defensive rebounds, which he actively collects. (74 of his 82 total rebounds on the year) As I had alluded to earlier, Thomas' handle really separates him from his peers, and it is likely that he will be a tremendous asset at the next level due in large part to his ability to drive against defenders. In his game against Albertus Magnus, he drew a foul on a nifty dribbling display. Overall, it is clear that Thomas is a steal at the next level for whichever team is willing to take a chance on him. He is a top 3 overall prospect outside of Division 1, and should land on one of the top teams overseas.


Finally, LaSell's Javon Williams has a game reminiscent of Indiana's undersized post player, AJ Moye. At 6'4, he utilizes his decent length and physical tools to outwork players in the post. His length makes him difficult to contest on drives inside, and he has decent enough footwork to score around defenders. Williams is more of a finesse player in the post and only attempted 4.4 free throws per game, despite having serviceable athleticism. He is exceedingly efficient with his post moves, and was able to shoot 62.1% from the floor on the year. While he is not a great shooter from the midrange or distance, he has the athletic tools to finish against bigger post players. He can hit jumpers in the lane though, and this allows him to keep defenses honest.


On the defensive end, Williams is solid. He often contests without fouling, and is one of the more productive players mentioned. He collected 1.2 steals per game and 1.5 blocks per game on the year. He is also physical inside and was able to gather 7.4 rebounds per game. He is effective boxing out and sealing his man so that he can grab boards. Overall, while Williams has the basketball IQ to succeed at the next level, his height may discourage teams from looking into him. If he continues to work hard and develop his midrange game, he may be able to land somewhere, likely in the Americas.


(Image Sources: theloquitur.com, wjbc.com, cloutierblognhr.blogspot.com, and jwuathletics.com)